Yoon DY, Mansukhani NA, Stubbs VC, Helenowski IB, Woodruff TK, Kibbe MR. Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research. Surgery. 2014 Sep;156(3):508–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.001
Huber E, Le Pogam MA, Clair C. Sex related inequalities in the management and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in Switzerland: cross sectional study. BMJ Med. 2022 Nov;1(1):e000300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000300
Maldonado B, Marsella J, Higgins A, Richardson SS. Malicious Midwives, Fruitful Vines, and Bearded Women - Sex, Gender, and Medical Expertise in the Journal. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jun;390(21):1941–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2404784
Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, Stavropoulou M, Harper C, Nascimento M, et al.; Gender Equality, Norms, and Health Steering Committee. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet. 2019 Jun;393(10189):2440–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X
Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero JJ, DeMeo DL, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020 Aug;396(10250):565–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0
Freeman A, Stanko P, Berkowitz LN, Parnell N, Zuppe A, Bale TL, et al. Inclusion of sex and gender in biomedical research: survey of clinical research proposed at the University of Pennsylvania. Biol Sex Differ. 2017 Jun;8(1):22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0139-5
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guideline for the study and evaluation of gender differences in the clinical evaluation of drugs; notice. Fed Regist. 1993 Jul;58(139):39406–16.
Geller SE, Koch AR, Roesch P, Filut A, Hallgren E, Carnes M. The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: A Study to Evaluate Compliance With Inclusion and Assessment of Women and Minorities in Randomized Controlled Trials. Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):630–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002027
Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 May;1(1):2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6
Duffy KA, Ziolek TA, Epperson CN. Filling the Regulatory Gap: Potential Role of Institutional Review Boards in Promoting Consideration of Sex as a Biological Variable. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):868–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.8084
Saxena A, Lasher E, Somerville C, Heidari S. Considerations of sex and gender dimensions by research ethics committees: a scoping review. Int Health. 2022 Nov;14(6):554–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihab093
Palmer-Ross A, Ovseiko PV, Heidari S. Inadequate reporting of COVID-19 clinical studies: a renewed rationale for the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e004997. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004997
Gender Education in Medicine for Switzerland. GEMS plateform. Gender Education in Medicine for Switzerland platform. Available on: www.gems-platform.ch