Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 155 No. 4 (2025)

Evaluating growth references used in Switzerland: a comparative analysis in Zurich schoolchildren

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025;155:3834
Published
15.04.2025

Summary

INTRODUCTION: The Swiss Society of Paediatrics currently recommends the growth references of the World Health Organization (WHO), while the Paediatric Endocrinology Centre Zurich (PEZZ) has proposed alternative growth references. Specialists and researchers also use International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) references to define overweight and obesity. We investigated the fit of anthropometric measurements from schoolchildren in the canton of Zurich to these three growth references and assessed the prevalence of overweight, obesity and short stature across the three references.

METHODS: We analysed data from 3755 children aged 6–17 years in the cross-sectional LuftiBus in the School (LUIS) study, collected in the period 2013–2016 in the canton of Zurich. We calculated z-scores of height, weight and body mass index (BMI) based on WHO, PEZZ and IOTF references. We compared the mean and distribution of z-scores to the expected standard normal distribution using the Anderson-Darling test. We classified overweight, obesity and severe obesity based on cutoff values given by the three references. We defined short stature as <3rd percentile of height for age.

RESULTS: The mean z-scores in LUIS were 0.56 for height, 0.28 for weight and 0.06 for BMI based on WHO references; 0.15 for height, 0.06 for weight and −0.01 for BMI based on PEZZ references; and 0.19 for BMI based on IOTF references. The Anderson-Darling test showed that children in LUIS fit worse to WHO and IOTF than to PEZZ references. The WHO classified fewer children as overweight than PEZZ and IOTF references (WHO: 8%; PEZZ: 15%; IOTF: 13%) but more children as obese or severely obese (6%; 4%; 3%). The WHO defined fewer children as being of short stature than PEZZ references (1% vs 3%).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that anthropometric data of schoolchildren in Zurich (LUIS) differ notably from WHO and IOTF references potentially leading to misclassification of overweight, obesity and short stature. Thus it would be timely to develop new nationally representative growth references for Switzerland.

References

  1. Umer A, Kelley GA, Cottrell LE, Giacobbi P Jr, Innes KE, Lilly CL. Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug;17(1):683. 10.1186/s12889-017-4691-z
  2. Horesh A, Tsur AM, Bardugo A, Twig G. Adolescent and Childhood Obesity and Excess Morbidity and Mortality in Young Adulthood-a Systematic Review. Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Sep;10(3):301–10. 10.1007/s13679-021-00439-9
  3. Prader A, Largo RH, Molinari L, Issler C. Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. First Zurich longitudinal study of growth and development. Helv Paediatr Acta, Suppl. 1989 Jun;52:1–125.
  4. Braegger C, Jenni O, Konrad D, Molinari L. Neue Wachstumskurven für die Schweiz. Paediatrica. 2011 Jan;22(1):9–11.
  5. Hamill PV, Johnston FE, Lemeshow S. Height and weight of youths 12-17 years. United States. Vital Health Stat 11. 1973 Jan;(124):1–81.
  6. Abraham S, Lowenstein FW, O’Connell DE. Preliminary findings of the first health and nutrition examination survey, United States, 1971-1972: Anthropometric and clinical findings. National Center for Health Statistics (US) Division of Health Examination Statistics. 1975 Apr; DHEW publication, no. (HRA) 75-1229.
  7. Hamill PV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF. NCHS growth curves for children birth-18 years. United States. Vital Health Stat 11. 1977 Nov; 165(i-iv):1-74.
  8. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Sep;85(9):660–7.
  9. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). A century of trends in adult human height. eLife. 2016 Jul;5:e13410. 10.7554/eLife.13410
  10. Natale V, Rajagopalan A. Worldwide variation in human growth and the World Health Organization growth standards: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014 Jan;4(1):e003735. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003735
  11. Eiholzer U, Meinhardt U. Die neuen Wachstumskurven sind für die Schweizer Kinder wahrscheinlich nicht repräsentativ. Forumnews. 2011 Sommer/11. Available from: https://www.pezz.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Redaktion/PDFs/Wachstum_Forum_GutzumDruck_unkorrigiert.pdf
  12. Jenni O, Braegger C, Konrad D, Molinari L, Kind C. Es gibt keine repräsentativen Wachstumskurven für Schweizer Kinder. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung. 2011 2011-09-07; 92(36):1393. Available from: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/58491/1/2011-36-660.pdf
  13. Eiholzer U, Fritz C, Katschnig C, Dinkelmann R, Stephan A. Contemporary height, weight and body mass index references for children aged 0 to adulthood in Switzerland compared to the Prader reference, WHO and neighbouring countries. Ann Hum Biol. 2019 Sep;46(6):437–47. 10.1080/03014460.2019.1677774
  14. Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2012 Aug;7(4):284–94. 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00064.x
  15. Mozun R, Kuehni CE, Pedersen ES, Goutaki M, Kurz JM, de Hoogh K, et al.; on behalf of the LUIS study group. LuftiBus in the school (LUIS): a population-based study on respiratory health in schoolchildren. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Aug;151(3132):w20544. 10.4414/smw.2021.20544
  16. Physical status: the use of and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Technical Report Series: 854. World Health Organization, 1995. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/37003
  17. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1305–19. 10.1002/sim.4780111005
  18. Daymont C, Ross ME, Russell Localio A, Fiks AG, Wasserman RC, Grundmeier RW. Automated identification of implausible values in growth data from pediatric electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov;24(6):1080–7. 10.1093/jamia/ocx037
  19. Mozun R, Ardura-Garcia C, Pedersen ES, Usemann J, Singer F, Latzin P, et al. Age and body mass index affect fit of spirometry Global Lung Function Initiative references in schoolchildren. ERJ Open Res. 2022 Apr;8(2):00618-2021. 10.1183/23120541.00618-2021
  20. Binder G, Woelfle J. S1-Leitlinie Kleinwuchs. AWMF Leitlinien: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderendokrinologie und -diabetologie. DGKED; 2023. Available from: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/174-004
  21. Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). United Nations, 2023. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
  22. Panczak R, Berlin C, Voorpostel M, Zwahlen M, Egger M. The Swiss neighbourhood index of socioeconomic position: update and re-validation. Swiss Med Wkly. 2023 Jan;153(1):40028. 10.57187/smw.2023.40028
  23. Urbanisierungsgrad 2011 (DEGURBA eurostat). Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS), 2020. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/de/13787277
  24. Scherdel P, Botton J, Rolland-Cachera MF, Léger J, Pelé F, Ancel PY, et al. Should the WHO growth charts be used in France? PLoS One. 2015 Mar;10(3):e0120806. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120806
  25. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  26. Posit Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA; 2023. https://www.posit.co/
  27. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/
  28. Rosario AS, Schienkiewitz A, Neuhauser H. German height references for children aged 0 to under 18 years compared to WHO and CDC growth charts. Ann Hum Biol. 2011 Mar;38(2):121–30. 10.3109/03014460.2010.521193
  29. Gleiss A, Lassi M, Blümel P, Borkenstein M, Kapelari K, Mayer M, et al. Austrian height and body proportion references for children aged 4 to under 19 years. Ann Hum Biol. 2013 Jul;40(4):324–32. 10.3109/03014460.2013.776110
  30. Heude B, Scherdel P, Werner A, Le Guern M, Gelbert N, Walther D, et al. A big-data approach to producing descriptive anthropometric references: a feasibility and validation study of paediatric growth charts. Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Dec;1(8):e413–23. 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30149-9
  31. Cole TJ. Secular trends in growth. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000 May;59(2):317–24. 10.1017/s0029665100000355
  32. Herman-Giddens ME. Recent data on pubertal milestones in United States children: the secular trend toward earlier development. Int J Androl. 2006 Feb;29(1):241–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00575.x
  33. Bellis MA, Downing J, Ashton JR. Adults at 12? Trends in puberty and their public health consequences. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Nov;60(11):910–1. 10.1136/jech.2006.049379
  34. Perola M, Sammalisto S, Hiekkalinna T, Martin NG, Visscher PM, Montgomery GW, et al.; GenomEUtwin Project. Combined genome scans for body stature in 6,602 European twins: evidence for common Caucasian loci. PLoS Genet. 2007 Jun;3(6):e97. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030097
  35. Batty GD, Shipley MJ, Gunnell D, Huxley R, Kivimaki M, Woodward M, et al. Height, wealth, and health: an overview with new data from three longitudinal studies. Econ Hum Biol. 2009 Jul;7(2):137–52. 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.06.004
  36. Zimmermann MB, Gübeli C, Püntener C, Molinari L. Detection of overweight and obesity in a national sample of 6-12-y-old Swiss children: accuracy and validity of reference values for body mass index from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the International Obesity Task Force. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):838–43. 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.838
  37. Stamm H, Bauschatz AS, Ceschi M, Guggenbühl L, Lamprecht M, Ledergerber M, et al. Vergleichende Auswertung der Daten des Schuljahres 2014/2015. Monitoring der Gewichtsdaten der schulärztlichen Dienste der Städte Basel, Bern und Zürich: Bern und Lausanne: Gesundheitsförderung Schweiz, 2016. Available from: https://gesundheitsfoerderung.ch/node/1174
  38. Stamm H, Bürgi R, Lamprecht M, Walter S. Analyse von Daten aus den Kantonen Aargau, Basel-Stadt, Genf, Graubünden, Jura, Luzern, Obwalden, St. Gallen und Uri sowie den Städten Bern, Freiburg, Winterthur und Zürich. Vergleichendes Monitoring der Gewichtsdaten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in der Schweiz: Bern und Lausanne: Gesundheitsförderung Schweiz, 2021. Available from: https://gesundheitsfoerderung.ch/sites/default/files/2023-01/Arbeitspapier_058_GFCH_2021-09_-_Vergleichendes_BMI-Monitoring.pdf
  39. Eiholzer U, Fritz C, Stephan A. The increase in child obesity in Switzerland is mainly due to migration from Southern Europe - a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan;21(1):243. 10.1186/s12889-021-10213-0
  40. Bevölkerung nach Migrationsstatus. Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS), 2022. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung/migration-integration/nach-migrationsstatuts.html
  41. Wright C, Lakshman R, Emmett P, Ong KK. Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):566–9. 10.1136/adc.2007.126854
  42. Júlíusson PB, Roelants M, Hoppenbrouwers K, Hauspie R, Bjerknes R. Growth of Belgian and Norwegian children compared to the WHO growth standards: prevalence below -2 and above +2 SD and the effect of breastfeeding. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Oct;96(10):916–21. 10.1136/adc.2009.166157
  43. A health professional’s guide for using the new WHO growth charts. Paediatr Child Health. 2010 Feb;15(2):84–98. 10.1093/pch/15.2.84
  44. Wachstumskurven anpassen oder nicht? Press release: pädiatrie schweiz; 22. Available from: https://www.paediatrieschweiz.ch/news/wachstumskurven/