##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 155 No. 11 (2025)

Assessing psychosocial maturity to diagnose severe personality development disorders in young adult males adjudicated of serious criminal offences: a psychometric validation study of a new instrument

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025;155:3793
Published
14.11.2025

Summary

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial maturity is one of the key factors for understanding the course of criminal offences in juveniles and young adults. Until recently, forensic-psychiatric assessments to diagnose a severe disorder of personality development remained mostly unguided because validated instruments were not available. A new tool, the Young Adult Personality Development (YAPD) instrument, was introduced in 2021 and consists of three dimensions related to psychosocial maturity: YAPD environmental, YAPD pathology and YAPD developmental tasks failure. The current study tested the reliability (internal consistency, interrater reliability) and concurrent validity of these dimensions.

METHODS: We analysed files of a consecutive sample of young adults in the Canton of Zurich (2007 to 2020, n = 234, mean age: 21.33 years, SD: 1.74 years), who were either assigned to specialised institutional treatment for young adults (Swiss Penal Code [SPC] Article 61) or outpatient treatment (SPC Article 63). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreements were used to analyse interrater reliability of YAPD dimensions across three independent raters. In the absence of a gold standard, we analysed concurrent validity by measuring the associations of the YAPD dimensions with expert opinion and sample status (judicial decisions on measures) using multiple logistic regressions.

RESULTS: Expert-rated personality development disorder was found to be highly prevalent in both samples. The YAPD dimensions showed adequate-to-good interrater reliability (ICC: 0.74–0.92). In logistic regression models, YAPD developmental tasks failure was related to diagnoses of severe development disorder and juridical decision on a measure for young adults according to SPC Art. 61. YAPD environmental was related to the diagnosis of a severe development disorder. YAPD pathology was found to be unrelated to the diagnosis of severe personality development disorder.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the YAPD developmental tasks failure dimension and to a lesser degree the YAPD environmental dimension as valid dimensions to diagnose severe personality development disorder. Structured assessment instruments such as the YAPD may further improve diagnostic decision-making in forensic psychiatry and psychology.

References

  1. 1. Bryan-Hancock C, Casey S. Psychological maturity of at-risk juveniles, young adults and adults: implications for the justice system. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2010;17(1):57–69. 10.1080/13218710903268006
  2. 2. Nixon TS. The Relationships between Age, Psychosocial Maturity, and Criminal Behavior [dissertation]. Cincinnati (OH): University of Cincinnati; 2020.
  3. 3. Welner M, DeLisi M, Knous-Westfall HM, Salsberg D, Janusewski T. Forensic assessment of criminal maturity in juvenile homicide offenders in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Mind Law. 2023;4:100112. 10.1016/j.fsiml.2022.100112
  4. 4. Galambos NL, MacDonald SW, Naphtali C, Cohen AL, de Frias CM. Cognitive performance differentiates selected aspects of psychosocial maturity in adolescence. Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(1):473–92. 10.1207/s15326942dn2801_2
  5. 5. Havighurst RJ. Developmental tasks and education. 3rd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd; 1972.
  6. 6. Manning ML. Havighurst’s developmental tasks, young adolescents, and diversity. Clearing House. 2002;76(2):75–8. 10.1080/00098650209604953
  7. 7. Steinberg L, Cauffman E. Maturity of judgment in adolescence: psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law Hum Behav. 1996;20(3):249–72. 10.1007/BF01499023
  8. 8. Monahan KC, Steinberg L, Cauffman E, Mulvey EP. Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1654–68. 10.1037/a0015862
  9. 9. Monahan KC, Steinberg L, Cauffman E, Mulvey EP. Psychosocial (im)maturity from adolescence to early adulthood: distinguishing between adolescence-limited and persisting antisocial behavior. Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov;25(4 Pt 1 4pt1):1093–105. 10.1017/S0954579413000394
  10. 10. Steinberg LD, Cauffman E, Monahan K. Psychosocial maturity and desistance from crime in a sample of serious juvenile offenders. Washington (DC): US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2015., Available from https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh176/files/pubs/248391.pdf
  11. 11. Cruise KR, Fernandez K, McCoy WK, Guy LS, Colwell LH, Douglas TR. The influence of psychosocial maturity on adolescent offenders’ delinquent behavior. Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2008;6(2):178–94. 10.1177/1541204007313229
  12. 12. Ozkan T, Worrall JL. A psychosocial test of the maturity gap thesis. Crim Just & Behav. 2017;44(6):815-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817694924
  13. 13. Dünkel F, Geng B, Passow D. Erkenntnisse der Neurowissenschaften zur Gehirnreifung. Argumenten für ein Jungtäterstrafrecht [German.]. Zeitschrift für Jugendkriminalrecht und Jugendhilfe. 2017;28(2):123–9.
  14. 14. Aebi M, Fenner C, Schlüsselberger M, Urwyler T, Sidler C. Massnahmenanordnungen bei jungen Erwachsenen: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung im Kanton Zürich [German.]. NKrim. 2023;1/2023:25–39.
  15. 15. Urwyler T, Sidler C, Aebi M. Massnahmen für junge Erwachsene nach Art. 61 StGB: Beurteilung der erheblich gestörten Persönlichkeitsentwicklung: Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag; 2021.
  16. 16. Frischknecht T, Schneider E, Schmalbach S. Welcher Psy-Experte darf’s denn sein? Kritische Überlegungen zur Auswahl von psychiatrischen und psychologischen Sachverständigen im Strafverfahren. Jusletter [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://jusletter.weblaw.ch/juslissues/2012/664/_10287.html__ONCE&login=false
  17. 17. Habermeyer E, Graf M, Noll T, Urbaniok F. Psychologen als Gutachter in Strafverfahren. Wie weiter nach dem Bundesgerichtsurteil BGer 6B_884/2014 vom 8. April 2015? [German.]. Aktuelle Juristische Praxis. 2016;2:127–34.
  18. 18. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al.; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct;351:h5527. 10.1136/bmj.h5527
  19. 19. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al.; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
  20. 20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. New Jersey: Hillsdale; 1988.
  21. 21. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155–63. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  22. 22. Bessler C, Stiefel D, Barra S, Plattner B, Aebi M. Psychische Störungen und kriminelle Rückfälle bei männlichen jugendlichen Gefängnisinsassen [Mental disorders and criminal recidivism in male juvenile prisoners]. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2019 Jan;47(1):73–88. 10.1024/1422-4917/a000612
  23. 23. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022.
  24. 24. Wickham H, Wickham MH. Package tidyverse 2. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyverse/tidyverse.pdf
  25. 25. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Lumley T, Warnes MG, Imports M. Package ‘gmodels’ 2018. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gmodels/gmodels.pdf
  26. 26. Bevilacqua L, Caflisch A, Endrass J, Rossegger A, Hachtel H, Graf M. Expert opinions on criminal law cases in Switzerland–an empirical pilot study. SMW. 2023;153(5):40073. doi: https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2023.40073
  27. 27. Esser G, Fritz A, Schmidt MH. Die Beurteilung der sittlichen Reife Heranwachsender im Sinne des § 105 JGG–Versuch einer Operationalisierung [German.]. Monatsschr Kriminol. 1991;74(6):356–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-1991-740603
  28. 28. von Buch J, Köhler D. Jugendlich oder erwachsen? RPsych. 2019;5(2):178–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.5771/2365-1083-2019-2-178
  29. 29. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  30. 30. Shabani A, Masoumian S, Zamirinejad S, Hejri M, Pirmorad T, Yaghmaeezadeh H. Psychometric properties of structured clinical interview for DSM‐5 Disorders‐Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV). Brain Behav. 2021 May;11(5):e01894. 10.1002/brb3.1894