##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 155 No. 9 (2025)

Analysing the potential of clinical ethics consultations for surgical education: a thematic and contextual analysis

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025;155:3688
Published
25.09.2025

Summary

STUDY AIMS: Although surgeons face ethical questions and conflicts in daily practice, surgical education lacks ethics training. This study explores the relevance of clinical ethics consultations in addressing ethical conflicts and their potential role in surgical education.

METHODS: This study explored the role of clinical ethics consultations (CECs) between 2012 and 2021 in both formal and informal surgical ethics education. First, data from each clinical ethics consultation were retrieved from the electronic medical database of the clinical ethics consultation services of the University Hospital Basel (USB) and the University Psychiatric Clinics Basel (UPK). Second, the data were analysed using thematic and contextual analysis. In the final step, the analysis included the identification of the educational focus. The methodological approach aimed to provide a detailed exploration of the role of clinical ethics consultations in surgical ethics education, despite the inherent constraints associated with document analysis and practical limitations regarding participant observation and interviewing.

RESULTS: Of the 359 clinical ethics consultations examined, 38 were related to surgical interventions and conditions. Surgeons were involved in all 38 clinical ethics consultations, but surgical residents were involved in only 17 (45%), including 10 (26%) that they had requested themselves. These 17 clinical ethics consultations met the inclusion criteria and were suitable for in-depth analysis. Analysis of the ethical topics (maximum of three per case) revealed four main themes: patients’ wishes (n = 8), treatment planning (n = 5), treatment of somatic diseases in patients with additional mental disorders (n = 5), and challenges in dealing with patients’ representatives/relatives (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS: Ethical issues faced by surgical residents are often unrelated to primary surgical concerns. Despite the importance of ethical decision-making training in medical education, residents participated in less than half of clinical ethics consultations. Surgical faculty should involve residents in interdisciplinary discussions and clinical ethics consultations to increase awareness. Surgical curricula should incorporate resources to improve ethics-related decision-making skills.

References

  1. 1. The General Surgery Milestone Project. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2014;6(1s1):320-328. doi:10.4300/JGME-06-01s1-40.1
  2. 2. Eckles RE, Meslin EM, Gaffney M, Helft PR. Medical ethics education: where are we? Where should we be going? A review. Acad Med. 2005 Dec;80(12):1143–52. 10.1097/00001888-200512000-00020
  3. 3. Moon MR, Hughes MT, Chen JY, Khaira K, Lipsett P, Carrese JA. Ethics skills laboratory experience for surgery interns. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(6):829–38. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.010
  4. 4. Angelos P, DaRosa DA, Derossis AM, Kim B. Medical ethics curriculum for surgical residents: results of a pilot project. Surgery. 1999 Oct;126(4):701–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70125-X
  5. 5. Scott KK, Chesire DJ, Burns JB Jr, Nussbaum MS. Proficiency of surgical faculty and residents with ethical dilemmas: is modeling enough? J Surg Educ. 2012;69(6):780–4. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.04.014
  6. 6. Hong DZ, Goh JL, Ong ZY, Ting JJ, Wong MK, Wu J, et al. Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun;21(1):338. 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5
  7. 7. Nemetz ET, Ganai S, Devon K. Teaching Surgical Ethics. In: Difficult Decisions in Surgical Ethics: An Evidence-Based Approach. Lonchyna VA, Kelley P, Angelos P, eds. Springer International Publishing; 2022:147-157. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84625-1_11
  8. 8. Martin BM, Love TP, Srinivasan J, Sharma J, Pettitt B, Sullivan C, et al. Designing an ethics curriculum to support global health experiences in surgery. J Surg Res. 2014 Apr;187(2):367–70. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.013
  9. 9. Marsden KA, Kaldjian LC, Carlisle EM. Ethical Issues Encountered During the Medical Student Surgical Clerkship. J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:272–7. 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.047
  10. 10. Raine SP. Ethical issues in education: medical trainees and the global health experience. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug;43:115–24. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.03.004
  11. 11. Schürmann J, Reiter-Theil S. The “Big Five” in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases.; 2016. doi:10.24894/BF.2016.09013
  12. 12. Reiter-Theil S, Wetterauer C. Ethics of the Psychotherapeutic Alliance, Shared Decision Making and Consensus on Therapy Goals. In: Trachsel M, Gaab J, Biller-Andorno N, Tekin Ş, Sadler JZ, editors. Oxford Handbook of Psychotherapy Ethics. Oxford University Press; 2019. pp. 271–87. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.013.25
  13. 13. Montaguti E, Schürmann J, Wetterauer C, Picozzi M, Reiter-Theil S. Reflecting on the Reasons Pros and Cons Coercive Measures for Patients in Psychiatric and Somatic Care: The Role of Clinical Ethics Consultation. A Pilot Study. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;10:441. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00441
  14. 14. Schürmann J, Wetterauer C, Westermair AL, Trachsel M. Das Basler Modell der prinzipienorientierten klinischen Ethikkonsultation 2.0 : Eine Einführung für die Psychiatrie [The Basel model of principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation 2.0 : An introduction for psychiatry]. Nervenarzt. 2024 Nov;95(11):1033–42. 10.1007/s00115-024-01710-9
  15. 15. Stoll J, Westermair AL, Kübler U, Reisch T, Cattapan K, Bridler R, et al. A two-center pilot study on the effects of clinical ethics support on coercive measures in psychiatry. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;22(1):370. 10.1186/s12888-022-04024-9
  16. 16. Page K. The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making? BMC Med Ethics. 2012 May;13(1):10. 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10
  17. 17. Kitchener KS. Intuition, Critical Evaluation and Ethical Principles: The Foundation for Ethical Decisions in Counseling Psychology. Couns Psychol. 1984;12(3):43–55. 10.1177/0011000084123005
  18. 18. Lawrence DJ. The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate. J Chiropr Humanit. 2007;14:34–40. 10.1016/S1556-3499(13)60161-8
  19. 19. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. Oxford University Press; 2019.
  20. 20. Teti SL, Armstrong K. Developing Novel Tools for Bioethics Education: ACECS and the Visual Analytics Dashboard. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Published online 2025:1-18. doi:10.1017/S0963180124000732
  21. 21. Klasen JM, Würth K, Kollmar O. ‘That’s okay for me.’ ‘But it’s not okay for me.’ Tension and balance between patient’s will and surgeon’s motivation. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2179–80. 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.037
  22. 22. Kannan S, Seo J, Riggs KR, Geller G, Boss EF, Berger ZD. Surgeons’ Views on Shared Decision-Making. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020 Jan;7(1):8–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1718
  23. 23. Crebbin W, Beasley SW, Watters DA. Clinical decision making: how surgeons do it. ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jun;83(6):422–8. 10.1111/ans.12180
  24. 24. McBride KE, Solomon MJ, Lambert T, O’Shannassy S, Yates C, Isbester J, et al. Surgical experience for patients with serious mental illness: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;21(1):47. 10.1186/s12888-021-03056-x
  25. 25. Milne DM, Naraynsingh V, Goolcharan S. Severe Mental Illness: A Contraindication to Watchful Waiting in Hernia Management? Cureus. 2021 May;13(5):e14915. 10.7759/cureus.14915
  26. 26. Verma P, Curtis C, Darisi RD, et al. Is Psychiatric Illness Associated With Risk for Postoperative Complications in the Outpatient Setting? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Published online February 23, 2023:S0278-2391(23)00099-X. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2023.01.013
  27. 27. Wetterauer C, Reiter-Theil S. Ethisches Spannungsfeld – Freiheit und Schutz im Kontext der psychiatrischen Versorgung. In: Riedel A, Lehmeyer S, editors. Ethik im Gesundheitswesen. Springer Reference Pflege – Therapie – Gesundheit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2020. pp. 1–13. 10.1007/978-3-662-58685-3_52-1
  28. 28. Winkler L, Wetterauer C. Provide Access to Information on Assisted Suicide for a Patient with a Diagnosis of Depression?: An Ethics Consultation. GeroPsych (Bern). 2021;34(2):57–62. 10.1024/1662-9647/a000259
  29. 29. Swiss Academy Of Medical Sciences. Ineffectiveness and Unlikelihood of Benefit: Dealing with the Concept of Futility in Medicine. Zenodo; 2021. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.5543448
  30. 30. Brown GT. Medical Futility in Concept, Culture, and Practice. J Clin Ethics. 2018;29(2):114–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/JCE2018292114
  31. 31. Andersson H, Svensson A, Frank C, Rantala A, Holmberg M, Bremer A. Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;23(1):29. 10.1186/s12910-022-00766-z