DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3913
Sexual assault is a human rights violation and a global public health concern. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines sexual violence as “any sexual act, attempt to obtain a sexual act, or other act directed against a person’s sexuality using coercion, by any person regardless of their relationship to the victim, in any setting. It includes rape, defined as the physically forced or otherwise coerced penetration of the vulva or anus with a penis, other body part or object” [1]. Other definitions insist on the lack of explicit consent rather than on the notion of coercion and refer to sexual assault as “any sexual contact or behaviour that occurs without explicit consent of the victim” [2]. The elimination “of all forms of violence against all women and girls in private and public spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation” is target 5.2 of Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG5) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [3]. In addition to elimination, ensuring prevention and protection, access to justice, victim support, and strengthened national and international coordination are key to combating sexual assault [4].
Switzerland ratified the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) in 2017, and recently released the national action plan for 2022–2026 (PAN CI 2022–2026), which highlights three priority areas, the third being specifically related to sexual violence [5, 6]. Measures 37 and 38 are related to ensuring medicolegal care for victims of sexual violence and developing cantonal healthcare-related guidelines for victims of sexual and domestic violence [6]. Action 42 relates specifically to the improvement of national sexual assault statistics, which is particularly important to help inform future policies, training strategies and surveillance that will ultimately help improve care provided to sexual assault victims [6]. The Council of Europe’s Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (GREVIO) insisted that Switzerland’s legal definition of rape did not comply with the international standard that consent must be explicit [7, 8]. The Swiss criminal code used to define “rape” (Art. 190) as the forc[ing] of a person of the female sex by threats or violence, psychological pressure or by being made incapable of resistance to submit to sexual intercourse. In January 2024, the Federal Council set the entry into force of the new sexual criminal law, with its new definition of rape, for 1 July 2024, as requested by a majority of cantons. The new law, Art. 190, Par. 1 states that “Any person who, against the will of another person, has sexual intercourse with that person, commits an act with that person similar to sexual intercourse involving penetration of the body, or who has that person perform such an act or who exploits that person’s state of shock to that end shall be liable to a custodial sentence (…)” [9]. Art 190, Par. 2 states: “Any person who forces another person to engage in or tolerate sexual intercourse or an act similar to sexual intercourse involving penetration of the body by using threats or violence, psychological pressure or by being made incapable of resistance shall be liable to a custodial sentence (…)” [9].
“Sexual abuse and Indecent assault” Art. 189, Par. 1 refers to “any person who, against the will of another person, performs a sexual act on that person or has that person perform such an act on them or who exploits that person’s state of shock to that end” [9]. Art. 189, Par. 2 refers to “any person who uses threats, force or psychological pressure on another person or makes that other person incapable of resistance in order to compel that person to carry out or tolerate a sexual act”. In the context of our study, we define sexual assault as any sexual contact or attempted sexual contact without consent [9].
In Switzerland, data on sexual assault can be obtained from various sources (figure 1), such as official police statistics to reported cases of assault taken from administrative data (hospitals, victim violence consultations), and population-based surveys on sexual assault among others. In the Canton of Geneva, criminal offences for domestic violence increased by 11% in 2023 compared with 2022. In view of these findings, the Conseil d’Etat has adopted its 2023–2028 action plan to combat domestic violence, which includes measures to better understand domestic violence including sexual violence and how to combat it [10]. No statistics on sexual violence provide a comprehensive picture of the problem, with different sources of data representing different pieces of the puzzle. Shame, fear, stigmatisation, lack of awareness, legislation and protocols and many other obstacles prevent an unknown number of people from disclosing, reporting or seeking treatment for sexual assault. Some people may also struggle with identifying violent sexual behaviour as violence. Sample surveys can act as a proxy for prevalence or incidence rates. According to WHO’s Global Database on the Prevalence of Violence Against Women, Switzerland is one of the twelve countries with the lowest prevalence estimates for lifetime physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence among ever-married/partnered women aged 15–49 (prevalence estimated at 12%) [11]. However, these estimates were conducted as part of Switzerland’s participation in the International Violence against Women Survey (CH-IVAWS) almost 20 years ago [12, 13]. The CH-IVAWS was administered to a sample of 1975 adult women aged 18–72 years from the Swiss German and Swiss French parts of Switzerland, excluding the Swiss Italian population.

Figure 1Sexual assault data in Switzerland, adapted from the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE): Administrative data collection on violence against women – Good practices [24]. * Multiple offenses possible. 1 gfs.bern. Le harcèlement sexuel et les violences sexuelles faites aux femmes sont répandus en Suisse. 2019. Available from: https://cockpit.gfsbern.ch/fr/cockpit/violence-sexuelles-en-suisse/. 2 Federal Statistical Office. Consultations de victimes selon l'infraction. Crime and criminal justice. 2022. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/crime-criminal-justice/assistance-victims/consultations-services.assetdetail.22684359.html. 3 Federal Statistical Office. Code pénal (CP): Infractions pénales et personnes prévenues. Crime and criminal justice. 2022. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/crime-criminal-justice/police/offences.assetdetail.21324220.html
The most recent survey conducted by GFS Bern on sexual violence prevalence in Switzerland was published in 2019 [14, 15]. At least 22% of women and girls over the age of 16 in a sample of 4495 reported having experienced sexual violence (captured in the survey as various forms of “non-consensual sexual acts”); 12% of them had had sex against their will, while 7% were prevented from moving or had pain inflicted on them to force them to have sex [14, 15].
Little is known in Switzerland about sexual violence in subpopulations. Studies have shown that lesbians, bisexual women, transgender and non-binary communities [16, 17] experience significantly higher rates of sexual assault and rape compared with heterosexual women [18–21], probably because of higher discrimination, psychosocial disadvantage, barriers to reporting and lack of specific support services [20]. Surveyed women with disabilities have been found to have a 4-fold higher risk of experiencing sexual assault in the past year compared to women without disabilities [22]. Being a member of an ethnic or sexual minorities can also affect recovery after sexual assault [23].
The official sexual assault statistics are produced by the Federal Statistics Office and are based on data in the Police Crime Statistics Report [25]. These recorded crime statistics such as police crime statistics reflect only a small fraction of women and girls who were exposed to sexual violence, as these incidents are very rarely reported to the police [26–28]. In 2022, 867 instances of rape and 752 sexual assaults were recorded in Switzerland, a country with 8.7 million people. During the same period in Sweden, a country with a population of approximately 10.4 million people, 9368 rapes were recorded by the police, in addition to 10,181 cases of “sexual molestation” [29]. Depending on the context, a higher rate of recorded sexual assault can actually reflect improvements in data collection, higher awareness and/or higher rates of reporting to the police [24].
Administrative data are data that are available and generated through routine collection, usually documenting the use of various types of services provided, such as medical care and victim legal consultations. The Swiss Federal Office of Statistics releases annual data on the number of people who have contacted a victim assistance centre and who have the status of beneficiary in accordance with the federal law on assistance to victims of crime (LAVI) and, since 2017, the Federal Act on Compulsory Social Measures and Placements Prior to 1981 (CSMPA). In 2022, there were 5859 victim consultations for sexual assault and rape [30]. Robust collection and analysis of such data can inform the general population as well as actors working in this field, including legislators, about the use of services after sexual assault, prevention and health education strategies and improve services for persons who are sexually assaulted. Studying service gaps and unmet needs based on administrative data can be a powerful tool for dialogue and advocacy at a national and international level to improve sexual assault prevention and response [31]. This is particularly important for Swiss hospital data on sexual assault.
Currently, Switzerland has registries for health-related outcomes such as HIV, cancer, transplants, hepatitis, air pollution and lung disease, among others. However, there is no countrywide observatory of people consulting for sexual assault in Swiss hospitals. Additionally, there has been little research on this subject, despite its importance for gaining knowledge about the characteristics of sexual assault victims, the assault that they experienced as well as the care and follow-up they received, and psychophysical and sexual health in the short, medium and long term [32–35].
The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics of all people including cisgender women, non-binary, queer people, transgender men with a vulva and vagina and transgender women, regardless of sexual orientation, aged ≥14 years, reporting sexual assault at the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments of Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and Lausanne University Hospitals (CHUV), between 2018 and 2021. The use of the term “woman” or “girl” throughout our report is used when referencing and discussing previous research or literature that refers to “women and girls”. This is the first step of a broader research project entitled “Sexual Assault Reporting – A study to improve prevention, information and care after sexual assault in emergency care settings”. The present retrospective study was conducted to inform the development of an electronic sexual assault report medicolegal file and a prospective multicentre study on people reporting sexual assault at the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments of the cantons of Geneva, Valais, Vaud and Ticino that started in 2022.
Retrospective data were collected for all people including cisgender women, non-binary, queer persons, transgender men with a vulva and vagina and transgender women, regardless of sexual orientation, ≥14 years old presenting to the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments of the Geneva (HUG) and Lausanne (CHUV) University Hospitals to report a sexual assault over a 4-year period (2018–2021) (figure 2). A case-level analysis was conducted, meaning each sexual assault record was treated as a separate case, even if multiple cases involved the same patient. The term queer is used here only to refer to gender identity and not sexual orientation. Children and adolescents <14, cisgender men and trans men with a penis (who usually do not consult obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments after a sexual assault) and recurrent patients with more than 3 sexual assaults reported at a participating centre within the study period (2018–2021) were excluded. For these recurrent patients, the first three assaults were included. Also, duplicate sexual assault reports that were not initially ordered by the police or the public prosecutor, as well as reports that did not include sexual assault but other types of physical or psychological violence alone were excluded. Starting in June 2020, the canton of Vaud increased the number of hospitals where a sexual assault report could be filed. Reports from Hopitaux d’Yverdons-les-Bains, Rennaz, Payerne, Nyon, Morges were excluded as they were outside of the scope of the ethics approval.

Figure 2Flowchart
The Romandy University Center of Legal Medicine (CURML), located on the two university hospital sites of Lausanne (CHUV) and Geneva (HUG) is a regional medicolegal centre created by the two university hospitals of French-speaking Switzerland. When a patient presents or is referred to the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments of HUG and CHUV for a sexual assault, they are triaged by a nurse and examined by an on-call forensic doctor from the CURML and a gynaecologist on duty at the gynaeco-obstetric emergency department of the two sites. Starting in 2020 in the canton of Vaud, the CURML-CHUV forensic doctors travel to the regional hospitals so the victims do not have to travel long distances. The main goal is to attend to the patient’s needs in the most coherent and coordinated manner by offering them medicopsychological and medicolegal follow-up throughout the short, medium and sometimes long term [39]. Treatment includes post-exposure prophylactic therapies, emergency contraception and various follow-up appointments that are slightly different at HUG and CHUV. At HUG, if desired, patients ≥16 years old are given an appointment at the Interdisciplinary Unit of Medicine and Prevention of Violence (UIMPV) with a psychologist the following day, a consultation at the HIV clinic five days after and an appointment at the gynaecological outpatient clinic approximately ten days after [39]. At CHUV, patients receive a single appointment at the psychosomatic and psychosocial clinic in the obstetrics and gynaecology department within 30 days after the sexual assault [40]. After the gynaecological and forensic assessment at the gynaeco-obstetric emergency department, the follow-up for patients <16 is established at the paediatrics department.
The medicolegal exam provides the necessary documentation, in the event of criminal proceedings and with the victim’s consent for the judicial authorities [39]. In 2018, the two regional university hospitals adopted the same paper format for the reporting of a medicolegal sexual assault, ensuring comparability between sites. We limited our analysis to the first four years, as a similar prospective study commenced in 2022. The data for this study were obtained from finalised sexual assault reports written and signed by the forensic doctor and gynaecologist who examined the patient and the heads of their unit, who review and sign every report. No patient follow-up was required.
Data from finalised medicolegal reports were entered into REDCap by study staff, including an epidemiologist, research nurses and medical student interns. Each case was assigned a unique identifier to ensure confidentiality. The dataset included key variables such as demographics, assault characteristics and forensic findings. REDCap’s quality control measures, including outlier detection and consistency checks, ensured data accuracy. Study staff also performed manual validation, reviewing records and verifying a random sample for discrepancies. Any inconsistencies were corrected, and once validation was complete, the dataset was locked for analysis.
For a full list of all variables and characteristics, please see the appendix.
This research project was approved by the Cantonal Research Ethics Commission of Geneva and Vaud, Switzerland (CCER Project ID 2016-01144) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the principles of Good Clinical Research Practices, the Human Research Act (HRA) and the Human Research Ordinance (HRO), as well as other locally relevant regulations [36–38].
Descriptive statistics were provided to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients reporting a sexual assault as well as the characteristics of the sexual assault itself. Statistical analyses were performed using the R base package of R software, version R-4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/).
A total of 962 sexual assault records during the 48-month study period were reviewed (414 from Lausanne University Hospital and 548 from Geneva University Hospitals), of which 740 cases were retained for analysis.
Twenty-three percent (n = 222) of the sexual assault records were ineligible for various reasons, with some cases having more than one reason for exclusion. Of the 222 cases excluded, 89 were minors under the age of 14, 51 were cisgender men or boys. Thirty-four cases reported sexual assaults at sites other than HUG or CHUV. As mentioned above, in June 2020, medicolegal exams became available at regional hospitals in the canton of Vaud, allowing women and girls reporting a sexual assault to consult at a local hospital rather than travel a long distance. For this reason, 34 cases benefited from the availability of these new services but were ineligible for inclusion in our study population. Three patients presented more than three times during the 4-year study period, of which 22 cases were excluded. Each of these patients’ first three sexual assault cases were included. Fifteen sexual assault cases were excluded as they were duplicate files, and five were outside of the timeline. Eight cases were not included in our analyses because the assault was not sexual in nature, or the patient later stated that the assault never occurred. There were seven cases that were excluded for various other reasons, most frequently because the patient initially requested then later refused the medicolegal exam, or left before the medicolegal exam could be conducted. Since this is a case-level analysis, the final dataset of 740 retained cases consists of individual reports of sexual assault, not necessarily unique patients.
Table 1 provides details on the sociodemographic characteristics of the 740 patients presenting to the hospital emergency departments for a sexual assault. The age range was 14–93 years with the median age being 24 years (IQR: 19–33). From 2018 to 2019, there was an increase in the number of sexual assault consultations seen in the emergency departments. In 2020, most likely because of COVID-19 and stay-at home orders, the emergency departments saw a decrease in the total number of people consulting in general and reporting sexual assaults, while in 2021 the number of consultations returned to the pre-Covid frequency.
Table 1Frequency of sexual assaults by year, site and sociodemographic characteristics of cases reported at the Geneva (HUG) and Lausanne (CHUV) University Hospitals (2018–2021). Values expressed as n (row group percentage) unless otherwise indicated.
| Variable | Responses | n = 740 |
| Age | Median (IQR) | 24 (19–33.2) |
| Range | 14 to 93 | |
| Site | CHUV | 300 (40%) |
| HUG | 440 (60%) | |
| Year of the assault | 2017 | 1 (0%) |
| 2018 | 174 (24%) | |
| 2019 | 216 (30%) | |
| 2020 | 156 (21%) | |
| 2021 | 182 (25%) | |
| 2022 | 3 (0%) | |
| missing | 8 | |
| Day of the week | Monday | 74 (10%) |
| Tuesday | 62 (8%) | |
| Wednesday | 85 (11%) | |
| Thursday | 79 (11%) | |
| Friday | 99 (13%) | |
| Saturday | 174 (24%) | |
| Sunday | 158 (21%) | |
| Unknown | 9 (1%) | |
| Season | Winter | 165 (23%) |
| Spring | 148 (20%) | |
| Summer | 248 (34%) | |
| Autumn | 171 (23%) | |
| Unknown | 8 | |
| Civil status | Single | 440 (60%) |
| Unknown | 125 (17%) | |
| Married | 67 (9%) | |
| Divorced | 44 (6%) | |
| Cohabiting | 43 (6%) | |
| Separated | 16 (2%) | |
| Widowed | 5 (1%) | |
| Victim’s nationality (region) | Switzerland | 279 (39%) |
| Unknown | 186 (25%) | |
| Europe | 146 (20%) | |
| Americas | 59 (8%) | |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 28 (4%) | |
| Middle East and North Africa | 22 (3%) | |
| Asia | 18 (2%) | |
| Pacific | 2 (0%) |
Forty-five percent of all sexual assaults took place during the weekend, on either a Saturday or Sunday. The summer months had the highest frequency of sexual assault consultations (34%) in comparison to the other seasons (winter: 23%, spring: 20%, autumn: 23%).
Most of the patients were from Switzerland (39%) or other European countries (20%), followed by people from North, Central or South America (8%). A small proportion of patients presenting for sexual assaults were originally from Sub-Saharan Africa (4%) or the Middle East and/or North Africa (3%) as well as Asia (2%). The nationality of 23% of the study participants was marked as unknown, because there was no mention of their citizenship on their sexual assault report. Sixty percent of the patients seeking emergency care for sexual assault were single, 15% were married (9%) or cohabiting (6%), and 8% were divorced (6%) or separated (2%). In 16% of the sexual assault reports, the civil status of the patient was missing.
In 58% of the sexual assaults, the victim reported knowing the assailant, while 28% of patients did not previously know the person who sexually assaulted them. Of those who knew their assaulter, over half (53%) were a friend, colleague, peer or acquaintance. Current intimate partners (17%) and former intimate partners (9%) represent a significant proportion of known assailants. Family members and authority figures were more rarely cited as the perpetrator in this population older than 14 (table 2).
Table 2Frequency of sexual assault characteristics of cases reported at the Geneva (HUG) and Lausanne (CHUV) University Hospitals (2018–2021). Values expressed as n (row group percentage).
| Variable | Responses | n = 740 |
| Assault location | Home | 418 (56%) |
| …Assailant’s home | 195 (26%) | |
| …Victim’s home | 169 (23%) | |
| …Friend/family member’s home | 43 (6%) | |
| …Couple’s home | 11 (1%) | |
| Public | 144 (19%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 78 (11%) | |
| Hotel | 31 (4%) | |
| Car | 23 (3%) | |
| Institutional care setting | 22 (3%) | |
| Other (including unspecified) | 17 (2%) | |
| Institution | 3 (0%) | |
| School | 2 (0%) | |
| Workplace | 2 (0%) | |
| Number of perpetrators | One | 569 (77%) |
| Multiple | 56 (8%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 115 (16%) | |
| Assailant known | No | 206 (28%) |
| Yes/Yes & no (1≤ assailants) | 431 (58%) | |
| …Friend/colleague/peer/acquaintance | 226 (53%) | |
| …Current intimate partner | 73 (17%) | |
| …Other (known to victim) | 39 (9%) | |
| …Former intimate partner | 37 (9%) | |
| …Other (unknown to victim) | 14 (3%) | |
| …Family member | 13 (3%) | |
| …Social network/internet acquaintance | 12 (3%) | |
| …Authority figure/care provider | 10 (2%) | |
| …Unknown | 6 (1%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 103 (14%) | |
| Mandated by police/public prosecutor | No | 441 (60%) |
| Yes | 299 (40%) | |
| Patient to press charges | No | 52 (7%) |
| Yes | 129 (17%) | |
| Undecided | 5 (1%) | |
| Unknown | 552 (75%) | |
| Not applicable | 2 | |
| Prior sexual assault | No | 121 (17%) |
| Yes | 139 (19%) | |
| Unknown | 467 (64%) | |
| Not applicable | 13 | |
| Time to examination | <24 hours | 374 (51%) |
| 24–72 hours | 236 (32%) | |
| 72 hours – 7 days | 96 (13%) | |
| >1 week | 32 (5%) | |
| Physical and psychological violence | No | 216 (30%) |
| Yes | 355 (48%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 161 (22%) | |
| Not applicable | 8 | |
| Condom use | No | 379 (57%) |
| Yes | 42 (6%) | |
| Yes and No | 33 (5%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 211 (32%) | |
| Not applicable | 75 | |
| Recent sexual contact | No | 557 (78%) |
| Yes | 161 (22%) | |
| Not applicable | 22 | |
| Amnesia | No | 473 (64%) |
| Yes | 267 (36%) | |
| First vaginal penetration | No | 635 (87%) |
| Yes | 66 (9%) | |
| Unknown | 33 (4%) | |
| Not applicable | 6 | |
| Contraception | No | 377 (51%) |
| Yes | 230 (31%) | |
| Unknown | 133 (18%) | |
| Menopause | No | 664 (90%) |
| Yes | 37 (5%) | |
| Unknown | 39 (5%) | |
| Pregnant at time of assault | No | 735 (99%) |
| Yes | 5 (1%) | |
| Menstruation | No | 552 (75%) |
| Yes | 68 (9%) | |
| Unknown | 120 (16%) | |
| Bathed/Washed body before examination | No | 252 (34%) |
| Yes | 335 (45%) | |
| Unknown | 153 (21%) | |
| Changed before examination | No | 187 (25%) |
| Yes | 300 (41%) | |
| Unknown | 253 (34%) | |
| Habitual alcohol consumption | No | 211 (29%) |
| Occasionally | 418 (57%) | |
| Regularly | 64 (9%) | |
| Daily | 38 (5%) | |
| Not applicable | 9 | |
| Alcohol prior to assault | No | 264 (36%) |
| Yes | 442 (60%) | |
| Unknown | 33 (4%) | |
| Not applicable | 1 | |
| Habitual drug consumption | No | 508 (70%) |
| Occasionally | 158 (22%) | |
| Regularly | 36 (5%) | |
| Daily | 25 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 13 | |
| Drugs prior to assault | No | 613 (84%) |
| Yes | 121 (16%) | |
| Not applicable | 6 |
In 8% of cases, there were multiple perpetrators, where the assailants were mostly a combination of known and unknown. There was one assailant in 77% of the sexual assault cases, and 16% of the patients did not know the number of perpetrators because of amnesia. Seventeen percent of patients stated that this was their first sexual assault, while 19% stated that they had experienced prior sexual assault. In 64% of the sexual assault reports, there was no mention of whether or not the person had another sexual assault experience.
The police or the public prosecutor ordered 40% of the sexual assault medicolegal examinations, while 60% came to the emergency department seeking care of their own volition. Seven percent of the patients clearly stated that they did not intend to press charges, while 17% declared that they intended to bring charges against their aggressor. For 75% of the sexual assaults, we do not have additional information on the survivor’s intention to press charges or not.
Fifty-one percent of patients presented for emergency care within 24 hours of the sexual assault, and another 32% within 24–72h, totalling 83% within the first 3 days. Thirteen percent came to the hospital between 72h and 7 days, and the remaining 4% came after one week.
Thirty-six percent of patients experienced some form of amnesia – either partial (42%) or total (58%). We are unable to differentiate between amnesia due to trauma (peritraumatic dissociation) and amnesia due to alcohol or substance use.
Substance use was widely prevalent in our sample: 60% reported consuming alcohol prior to the sexual assault and 16% reported using drugs. In total, most patients (63%) reported some type of substance use, of which 96 reported use of both alcohol and drugs. When asked about their drinking habits, 57% responded that they drink alcohol occasionally, and 14% drink either regularly (9%) or daily (5%). When asked about their drug habits, 22% responded that they use drugs occasionally, and 8% use drugs either regularly (5%) or daily (3%). Among those using drugs, the most frequently cited drugs were cannabis or hashish (81%), cocaine (31%) and ecstasy or MDMA (10%).
Approximately one quarter of the patients were unable to recall or specify which types of penetration (if any) they were subjected to, because of amnesia. Vaginal penetration was reported by 67%, anal penetration by 17% and oral penetration by 21% (table 3). One hundred and ninety-one patients reported more than one penetration site (2 sites penetrated n = 145, 3 sites penetrated n = 46). Of the people who reported vaginal penetration, penile penetration was reported in 85% of cases and digital penetration in 40% of cases. Ejaculation was reported in 34% of sexual assaults with vaginal-penile penetration.
Table 3Sexual assault penetration sites and penetrant types (penile, digital, tongue, object, other) (n = 740). All data are n (row percentage). There may be more than one penetration site or penetrant type per person (4% reported no penetration, 72% reported at least one penetration site, 24% reported not knowing or not remembering if there was penetration).
| Penetration site | Yes | No | Unknown (amnesia) | Penile penetration | Ejaculation (Yes) | Ejaculation (No) | Ejaculation unknown (amnesia) | Digital (finger) | Tongue | Object | Other |
| Vaginal | 485 (67%) | 59 (8%) | 182 (25%) | 410 (85%) | 140 (34%) | 95 (23%) | 175 (43%) | 196 (40%) | 21 (4%) | 8 (2%) | 4 (1%) |
| Anal | 122 (17%) | 407 (57%) | 191 (27%) | 91 (75%) | 12 (13%) | 29 (32%) | 49 (54%) | 40 (33%) | 3 (2%) | 3 (2%) | – |
| Oral | 154 (21%) | 378 (52%) | 190 (26%) | 150 (97%) | 28 (19%) | 84 (57%) | 36 (24%) | 4 (3%) | 5 (3%) | 0 | – |
Of the people who reported anal penetration, penile penetration was reported in 75% of cases and digital penetration in 33% of cases. Ejaculation was reported in 13% of sexual assaults with anal-penile penetration. For 66 patients, the sexual assault was the victim’s first vaginal penetration (9%). In line with the age structure of the sample, 6% of the patients confirmed that they had undergone menopause. 31% of the patients were currently using some form of contraception, while 9% of the total sample was menstruating at the time of the assault and 1% was pregnant.
Almost 60% declared that a condom was not used during the assault, and only 6% of the victims noted the use of a condom. 32% were unsure if a condom was used or not, due to amnesia. The use of physical or psychological violence was described in 48% of sexual assaults, with 22% of the patients being unsure due to amnesia. Of the patients who experienced violence, 95% described it as physical and 32% described experiencing psychological abuse. Various types of physical violence were employed, such as being held down against their will, being hit (36%), shoved or pushed (31%), strangled (25%), held by their hair (15%) or bitten (7%). The use of a weapon was recorded in 31 sexual assault cases, with knives being the weapon most frequently used.
The forensic doctors recorded body injuries in 84% of the sexual assault reports (figure 3). The sites of injury in decreasing order of frequency were lower limb injuries (75%) and upper limb injuries (72%), followed by injuries to the torso (31%), head/face (24%), back (20%), neck (19%) and buttocks (15%).

Figure 3Body injuries according to site (n = 619, 84%).
Of the 740 patients reporting sexual assault, 23 forwent the gynaecological exam for various reasons, the most common being that the patient refused the exam (n = 16). Gynaecological exam data were not available for an additional 12 study participants.
Of the 705 patients who underwent gynaecological examination, 24% presented with genital injury. Among the 467 reporting vaginal penetration, the percentage of genital injury was 28% (table 4). Genital injuries were present in 21% of the patients aged 19–49, in 30% of patients aged 14–19 and 33% of patients aged 50–93. The earlier the examination, the more frequently genital injury was observed (<24 h: 27%, 24 h–72 h: 25%), progressively decreasing to 16% detection at 72 h – 1 week and finally 12% at 1 week or more. Genital injuries were observed in 38% of sexual assaults involving more than one perpetrator and in 25% of sexual assaults with a single perpetrator.
Table 4Frequency of genital injuries among patients who underwent a gynaecological examination (n = 705). All data expressed as n (row percentage).
| Variable | Responses | All | No genital injury | Genital injury |
| n = 705 | n = 533 | n = 172 | ||
| Age | 14–19 | 212 | 148 (70%) | 64 (30%) |
| 20–49 | 451 | 357 (79%) | 94 (21%) | |
| 50–93 | 42 | 28 (67%) | 14 (33%) | |
| Time to examination | <24 hours | 357 | 260 (73%) | 97 (27%) |
| 24–72 hours | 223 | 168 (75%) | 55 (25%) | |
| 72 hours – 7 days | 91 | 76 (84%) | 15 (16%) | |
| >1 week | 32 | 28 (88%) | 4 (12%) | |
| Not applicable | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| Known assailant | No | 196 | 135 (69%) | 61 (31%) |
| Yes | 409 | 311 (76%) | 98 (24%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 100 | 87 (87%) | 13 (13%) | |
| Number of perpetrators | One | 541 | 406 (75%) | 135 (25%) |
| Multiple | 52 | 32 (62%) | 20 (38%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 112 | 95 (85%) | 17 (15%) | |
| Vaginal penetration | No | 47 | 42 (89%) | 5 (11%) |
| Yes | 467 | 338 (72%) | 129 (28%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 177 | 145 (82%) | 32 (18%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 8 | 6 | |
| Vaginal penetration – penis | No | 118 | 91 (77%) | 27 (23%) |
| Yes | 396 | 289 (73%) | 107 (27%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 177 | 145 (82%) | 32 (18%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 8 | 6 | |
| Vaginal penetration – finger(s) | No | 331 | 248 (75%) | 83 (25%) |
| Yes | 183 | 132 (72%) | 51 (28%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 177 | 145 (82%) | 32 (18%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 8 | 6 | |
| Vaginal penetration – object(s) | No | 507 | 376 (74%) | 131 (26%) |
| Yes | 7 | 4 (57%) | 3 (43%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 177 | 145 (82%) | 32 (18%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 8 | 6 | |
| Number of vaginal penetrants | None | 50 | 43 (86%) | 7 (14%) |
| Single | 342 | 249 (73%) | 93 (27%) | |
| Multiple | 122 | 88 (72%) | 34 (28%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 177 | 145 (82%) | 32 (18%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 8 | 6 | |
| Anal penetration | No | 386 | 289 (75%) | 97 (25%) |
| Yes | 113 | 77 (68%) | 36 (32%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 186 | 154 (83%) | 32 (17%) | |
| Not applicable | 20 | 13 | 7 |
When the survivor knew the assailant, the percentage of genital injury was 24% while it was 31% when they did not know the assailant. Digital vaginal penetration (penetration by finger) and penile-vaginal penetration had similar rates of genital injury (28% and 27%, respectively). There were 7 cases of vaginal penetration with an object, of which 3 (43%) presented with genital injury. Vulvar injury was the most frequent site for genital injury, specifically on the inner labia (7%), posterior commissure (5%) and outer labia (5%) (figure 4).

Figure 4Ano-genital injuries (n = 196, 28%) according to site among patients who underwent a gynaecological exam (n = 705). Anal injury (n = 24, 21%) among patients who underwent a gynaecological exam and reported anal penetration (n = 113). Genital injury (n = 129, 28%) among patients who underwent a gynaecological exam and reported vaginal penetration (n = 467). Illustration: Romain Dewaele © https://www.unige.ch/ssi
Of the 705 patients who underwent a gynaecological examination, 5% presented with anal injury. Among the 113 patients reporting anal penetration, 21% presented with anal injury (table 5).
Table 5Frequency of anal injuries among patients who underwent a gynaecological examination (n = 705). All data expressed as n (row percentage).
| Variable | Responses | All | No anal injury | Anal injury |
| n = 705 | n = 667 | n = 38 | ||
| Age | 14–19 | 212 | 206 (97%) | 6 (3%) |
| 20–49 | 451 | 423 (94%) | 28 (6%) | |
| 50–93 | 42 | 38 (90%) | 4 (10%) | |
| Time to examination | <24 hours | 357 | 337 (94%) | 20 (6%) |
| 24–72 hours | 223 | 210 (94%) | 13 (6%) | |
| 72 hours – 7 days | 91 | 87 (96%) | 4 (4%) | |
| >1 week | 32 | 31 (97%) | 1 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| Known assailant | No | 196 | 183 (93%) | 13 (7%) |
| Yes | 409 | 387 (95%) | 22 (5%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 100 | 97 (97%) | 3 (3%) | |
| Number of perpetrators | One | 541 | 512 (95%) | 29 (5%) |
| Multiple | 52 | 48 (92%) | 4 (8%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 112 | 107 (96%) | 5 (4%) | |
| Anal penetration | No | 386 | 380 (98%) | 6 (2%) |
| Yes | 113 | 89 (79%) | 24 (21%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 186 | 180 (97%) | 6 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 18 | 2 | |
| Anal penetration – penis | No | 415 | 406 (98%) | 9 (2%) |
| Yes | 84 | 63 (75%) | 21 (25%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 186 | 180 (97%) | 6 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 20 | 18 | 2 | |
| Anal penetration – finger(s) | No | 462 | 436 (94%) | 26 (6%) |
| Yes | 37 | 33 (89%) | 4 (11%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 186 | 180 (97%) | 6 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 20 | 18 | 2 | |
| Anal penetration – object | No | 496 | 467 (94%) | 29 (6%) |
| Yes | 3 | 2 (67%) | 1 (33%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 186 | 180 (97%) | 6 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 20 | 18 | 2 | |
| Number of anal penetrants | None | 386 | 380 (98%) | 6 (2%) |
| Single | 102 | 80 (78%) | 22 (22%) | |
| Multiple | 11 | 9 (82%) | 2 (18%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 186 | 180 (97%) | 6 (3%) | |
| Not applicable | 20 | 18 | 2 | |
| Vaginal penetration | No | 47 | 40 (85%) | 7 (15%) |
| Yes | 467 | 445 (95%) | 22 (5%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 177 | 169 (95%) | 8 (5%) | |
| Not applicable | 14 | 13 | 1 |
Table 6 presents the distribution of key factors by timing of medico-legal consultation. Police or prosecutor-mandated cases, unknown assailant, and reported alcohol use before the assault were more frequently documented among early consultations (<24 h), while late consultations (≥24 h) included more older individuals and cases involving a known perpetrator. Reports of multiple penetrants were uncommon and somewhat more frequent in late consultations. Object penetration was rarely reported; most vaginal object penetration cases were documented in late consultations, while anal object penetration cases more often occurred in early consultations.
Table 6Factors according to timing of sexual assault medicolegal consultation. All data are expressed as n (row percentage).
| Variable | Modality | All* | Late (≥24 hours) consultation | Early (<24 hours) consultation |
| n = 738 | n = 364 | n = 374 | ||
| Mandated by police or public prosecutor | No | 440 | 252 (57%) | 188 (43%) |
| Yes | 298 | 112 (38%) | 186 (62%) | |
| Age | 14–19 | 220 | 101 (46%) | 119 (54%) |
| 20–49 | 474 | 238 (50%) | 236 (50%) | |
| 50–93 | 44 | 25 (57%) | 19 (43%) | |
| Use of physical violence | No | 235 | 119 (51%) | 116 (49%) |
| Yes | 336 | 172 (51%) | 164 (49%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 159 | 70 (44%) | 89 (56%) | |
| Missing | 8 | 3 | 5 | |
| Weapon | No | 536 | 270 (50%) | 266 (50%) |
| Yes | 31 | 18 (58%) | 13 (42%) | |
| Unknown | 162 | 72 (44%) | 90 (56%) | |
| Missing | 9 | 4 | 5 | |
| Amnesia | No | 473 | 233 (49%) | 240 (51%) |
| Yes | 265 | 131 (49%) | 134 (51%) | |
| Known assailant | No | 206 | 88 (43%) | 118 (57%) |
| Yes | 430 | 240 (56%) | 190 (44%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 102 | 36 (35%) | 66 (65%) | |
| Number of perpetrators | One | 568 | 291 (51%) | 277 (49%) |
| Multiple | 56 | 29 (52%) | 27 (48%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 114 | 44 (39%) | 70 (61%) | |
| Alcohol before assault | No | 262 | 157 (60%) | 105 (40%) |
| Yes | 442 | 183 (41%) | 259 (59%) | |
| Unknown | 33 | 23 (70%) | 10 (30%) | |
| Missing | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Drugs before assault | No | 611 | 310 (51%) | 301 (49%) |
| Yes | 121 | 52 (43%) | 69 (57%) | |
| Missing | 6 | 2 | 4 | |
| Vaginal penetration | No | 59 | 31 (53%) | 28 (47%) |
| Yes | 485 | 244 (50%) | 241 (50%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 180 | 85 (47%) | 95 (53%) | |
| Missing | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
| Vaginal penetration – Penis | No | 134 | 64 (48%) | 70 (52%) |
| Yes | 410 | 211 (51%) | 199 (49%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 180 | 85 (47%) | 95 (53%) | |
| Missing | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
| Vaginal penetration – Finger(s) | No | 348 | 177 (51%) | 171 (49%) |
| Yes | 196 | 98 (50%) | 98 (50%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 180 | 85 (47%) | 95 (53%) | |
| Missing | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
| Vaginal penetration – Object(s) | No | 536 | 268 (50%) | 268 (50%) |
| Yes | 8 | 7 (88%) | 1 (12%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 180 | 85 (47%) | 95 (53%) | |
| Missing | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
| Number of vaginal penetrants | None | 62 | 32 (52%) | 30 (48%) |
| Single | 350 | 170 (49%) | 180 (51%) | |
| Multiple | 132 | 73 (55%) | 59 (45%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 180 | 85 (47%) | 95 (53%) | |
| Missing | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
| Anal penetration | No | 407 | 199 (49%) | 208 (51%) |
| Yes | 122 | 67 (55%) | 55 (45%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 189 | 89 (47%) | 100 (53%) | |
| Missing | 20 | 9 | 11 | |
| Anal penetration – Penis | No | 438 | 210 (48%) | 228 (52%) |
| Yes | 91 | 56 (62%) | 35 (38%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 189 | 89 (47%) | 100 (53%) | |
| Missing | 20 | 9 | 11 | |
| Anal penetration – Finger(s) | No | 489 | 248 (51%) | 241 (49%) |
| Yes | 40 | 18 (45%) | 22 (55%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 189 | 89 (47%) | 100 (53%) | |
| Missing | 20 | 9 | 11 | |
| Anal penetration – Object(s) | No | 526 | 265 (50%) | 261 (50%) |
| Yes | 3 | 1 (33%) | 2 (67%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 189 | 89 (47%) | 100 (53%) | |
| Missing | 20 | 9 | 11 | |
| Number of anal penetrants | None | 407 | 199 (49%) | 208 (51%) |
| Single | 110 | 59 (54%) | 51 (46%) | |
| Multiple | 12 | 8 (67%) | 4 (33%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 189 | 89 (47%) | 100 (53%) | |
| Missing | 20 | 9 | 11 | |
| Oral penetration | No | 378 | 187 (49%) | 191 (51%) |
| Yes | 154 | 82 (53%) | 72 (47%) | |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 188 | 87 (46%) | 101 (54%) | |
| Missing | 18 | 8 | 10 |
* Time to consultation was missing for 2 women.
Of the patients who were not using a form of contraception, were not pregnant or postmenopausal, 264 reported penile-vaginal penetration and/or penile-anal penetration. Of these 264 patients, 118 received emergency contraception (45%) while 34 (13%) did not. The reason that the 34 eligible patients did not receive emergency contraception was either because they refused or the reason that no contraception was given was unknown. It is unknown whether 111 patients (42%) received emergency contraception or not.
Antibiotic prophylaxis for gonorrhoea (ceftriaxone 500 mg) was prescribed for 29% of the victims, while antibiotic prophylaxis for chlamydia (azithromycin 1 g) was prescribed for 34% of the victims. Similarly, post-exposure prophylaxis to protect against HIV infection (HIV‑PEP emtricitabine/tenofovir and lopinavir/ritonavir) was prescribed in 31% of cases, while its prescription is unknown for 42% of cases (table 7). In Geneva, 35% of the patients were recommended to attend a follow-up appointment with an infectious disease specialist.
Table 7Frequency of treatment and follow-up appointment. All data are expressed as n (row percentage).
| Variable | Modality | n |
| Emergency contraception prescribed, n = 740 | No | 261 (35%) |
| Yes | 225 (30%) | |
| Missing | 254 (34%) | |
| Gonorrhoea prophylaxis (ceftriaxone), n = 740 | No | 135 (18%) |
| Yes | 213 (29%) | |
| Missing | 392 (53%) | |
| Chlamydia prophylaxis (azithromycin), n = 740 | No | 120 (16%) |
| Yes | 251 (34%) | |
| Missing | 368 (50%) | |
| Not applicable | 1 | |
| Hepatitis B immunoglobulin/vaccine, n = 740 | No | 273 (37%) |
| Yes | 111 (15%) | |
| Missing | 353 (48%) | |
| Not applicable | 3 | |
| PEP starter and PEP prescribed, n = 740 | No | 201 (27%) |
| Yes | 226 (31%) | |
| Missing | 311 (42%) | |
| Not applicable | 2 | |
| Appointment with Infectious Disease department proposed (HUG), n = 440 | No | 73 (17%) |
| Yes | 154 (35%) | |
| Missing | 213 (48%) | |
| Not applicable | 1 | |
| UIMPV appointment proposed (HUG) , n = 440 | No | 49 (11%) |
| Yes | 218 (50%) | |
| Missing | 173 (39%) |
UIMPV: Interdisciplinary Unit of Medicine and Prevention of Violence.
Victim alcohol consumption varied by perpetrator type. Among survivors assaulted by acquaintances, alcohol use prior to the assault was reported in 50% of cases, and in 63% of cases when the perpetrator was unknown. The highest proportion was observed when the survivor experienced amnesia (80%). In contrast, alcohol consumption was less frequently reported among survivors assaulted by current intimate partners (22%) or family members (31%). Alcohol use was also reported for 44% of cases involving former intimate partners and 57% of assaults by authority figures or care providers (table 8).
Table 8Alcohol consumption according to perpetrator type (when known). All data are expressed as n (row percentage).
| Type of perpetrator | n | No alcohol | Alcohol | Unknown consumption |
| n = 264 | n = 442 | n = 33 | ||
| Friend/colleague/peer/acquaintance | 226 | 93 (41%) | 127 (56%) | 6 (3%) |
| Unknown (perpetrator unknown to survivor) | 206 | 51 (25%) | 142 (69%) | 13 (6%) |
| Unknown (amnesia) | 103 | 10 (10%) | 90 (87%) | 3 (3%) |
| Current intimate partner | 73 | 45 (62%) | 22 (30%) | 6 (8%) |
| Other (known to survivor) | 39 | 17 (44%) | 19 (49%) | 3 (8%) |
| Former intimate partner | 37 | 19 (51%) | 16 (43%) | 2 (5%) |
| Other (unknown to survivor) | 14 | 2 (14%) | 11 (79%) | 1 (7%) |
| Family member | 13 | 7 (54%) | 6 (46%) | 0 (0%) |
| Social network/internet acquaintance | 12 | 8 (67%) | 4 (33%) | 0 (0%) |
| Authority figure/care provider | 10 | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | 0 (0%) |
| Missing | 6 | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | 0 (0%) |
| Not applicable | 1 | Not applicable | 1 | Not applicable |
Our study highlights the key sociodemographic and assault characteristics of victims reporting sexual assault between 2018 and 2021 in the cantons of Geneva and Vaud, Switzerland. These results can inform evidence-based prevention, care and education campaigns against sexual assault for both men and women, also addressing attitudes and behaviours toward rape and rape culture, to prevent sexual assault and to dispel rape myths. In addition, it informed the development of an electronic sexual assault report medicolegal file and a prospective multicentre study on people reporting sexual assault at the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments of the cantons of Geneva, Valais, Vaud and Ticino that started in 2022.
Rape does not necessarily involve a stranger. One of the more common myths about rape and sexual assault is that rape usually involves a stranger. However, as has also been shown in large-scale surveys of violence and gender relations, our results highlight that rape does not necessarily involve a stranger, since 58% of the patients who have consulted our services reported knowing the assailant [41]. However, the population who consulted the emergency departments differs from the population that attended the LAVI centres. In comparison to the clients of the LAVI centres, our population is younger, and the assailant is not often an intimate partner, but rather a friend, colleague or acquaintance (53%). Anyone who has suffered direct physical, psychological or sexual harm as a result of a crime is entitled to the support provided by this law (LAVI). Victims of intimate partner violence may report the sexual assault less frequently, or never, or somewhere other than the emergency department. This is important not only from an epidemiological perspective, but critical when planning how to provide medical treatment and follow-up for different populations and when planning sensitisation and training of healthcare professionals.
Our results highlight a key message to help improve service provision for victims of sexual assault as well as prevention and education strategies: sexual assault reporting at emergency departments is more frequent during the summer months and at weekends. Swiss hospital emergency departments should be aware of the increased incidence of sexual assaults during these times and plan accordingly. A report analysing seasonal patterns of crime from 1993 to 2010 in the United States showed similar results in that rape and sexual assault rates were higher during the summer than winter, spring and autumn [42]. However, it is unknown why these crimes are more likely to occur during the summer and whether it is related to the temperature, more hours of daylight, more flexible vacation-like schedules or a different amount of layers of clothes for both the victim and the assailant [43]. A report analysing sexual assault patterns by day of the week in the UK also showed similar results with more sexual assaults occurring at weekends (Friday, Saturday, Sunday). The authors also found that as the weather improved, more people were socialising outdoors, and for longer and later, leading to an increase of sexual assault [43]. Prevention efforts and education campaigns could be in full effect during summer festivals and summer nightlife activities, including bringing attention to and dispelling rape myths originating from common stereotypes [44].
This study has informed a prevention campaign in Valais, Vaud and Geneva. Prevention messages and education on what to do in case of sexual assault, such as when, where and why to consult an emergency department will be addressed. The official Vaud website already explains where and how to seek medical care after a sexual assault [45]. The Geneva canton website mainly refers to the police and mentions the possibility of consulting the hospital to collect evidence of the assault [46]. Available information could be updated with clear indications on how the evidence is collected and the healthcare that victims can and will receive, even when they do not want to collect evidence and press charges but simply receive prophylactic treatments, counselling, information and psychological support.
Many cross-sectional studies have found a significant relationship between alcohol consumption (by the victim, the perpetrator or both) and sexual assault [32, 47–49]. Alcohol is commonly noted as a risk factor for sexual assault perpetration, with 34% to 74% of sexual violence perpetrators reporting alcohol use at the time of the sexual assault [50–52]. Alcohol and drug use decreases the victim’s and perpetrator’s risk perception and increases vulnerability for exposure to violence [50, 53]. In line with previous publications, alcohol and drug use were prevalent in patients reporting sexual assault within our population. Toxicological investigations were not systematically performed and thus we were unable to evaluate the alcohol and drug use of the alleged sexual assault perpetrators. Within the Geneva and Lausanne population of patients reporting sexual assaults, 60% said that alcohol was involved. In comparison to a previous study carried out in University of Geneva Hospitals, alcohol was consumed by 48% of the population presenting for sexual assault [47]. The fact that children were included in the previous study may explain why alcohol was less frequently found. While other studies reported drug use in up to 34% of sexual assaults, 16% of our victim population reported consuming drugs prior to the assault (n = 121) [54]. Some researchers differentiate between substance-related victimisation or incapacitated rape and forcible rape [28, 30]. In these papers, forcible rape involves the use of physical force or threat of force or harm. Incapacitated rape is usually associated with their “voluntary consumption” or an intake of substances without knowledge: “drug- or alcohol-facilitated rape”. Such differentiation has been thought to be useful to inform prevention and information campaigns and be part of a minimum dataset on sexual assault [48, 53]. According to a review by Testa and Livingston, “it appears that most incidents of incapacitated rape follow voluntary consumption of large amounts of alcohol as opposed to deliberate intoxication of the woman by a perpetrator”, particularly among younger women [48]. Alcohol use is less frequently involved in sexual assaults among current intimate partners than any other type of relationship, which is also reflected among our population (table 8) [48]. Alcohol can be associated with an increased risk of sexual assault, particularly by non-intimate partners [55, 56]. Risk increases with heavy alcohol use [48]. WHO defines heavy episodic drinking (HED) as consuming at least 60 grams or more of pure alcohol during a single occasion [57]. Consumption of 60 grams of pure alcohol approximately corresponds to 6 standard alcoholic drinks (for example, a 100 ml serving of 12% wine contains 9.6 g ethanol while a 300 ml serving of 4.5% beer contains 10.8 g ethanol) [57, 58]. For future research and prevention efforts, we would like to be able to differentiate between heavy episodic drinking and other types of consumption. Knowing more about this could inform prevention and risk reduction programmes. Future prevention campaigns in Switzerland could use our data to promote awareness on safe and consensual sex when alcohol is involved and engaging in a community-based approach to avoid placing the burden of prevention only on the women. Heavy alcohol use might contribute to amnesia; indeed half of the patients who reported alcohol consumption also reported amnesia vs fewer than 15% among those who did not drink alcohol. However, we are unable to draw conclusions from our sample about when and how amnesia is related to alcohol or other substance consumption, trauma or several associated causes. Peritraumatic dissociation is defined as “a complex array of reactions at the time of a trauma that include depersonalisation, derealisation, dissociative amnesia, out-of-body experiences, emotional numbness and altered time perception” [59]. Previous studies found correlations between such peritraumatic dissociations and acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder [59–61]. Training to increase professionals’ knowledge and recognition of risk factors associated with acute stress disorder could improve the healthcare of those patients that require interventions in the acute phase to decrease the risk of developing a mental health disorder [61].
Having previously experienced sexual assault is a key vulnerability factor for sexual revictimisation [62–64]. A similar 10-year retrospective Italian study found that 26.7% of the women reporting sexual assault had been previously exposed to sexual assault. Among our sample, 19% of the sexual assaults reported were among patients who had already experienced at least one prior sexual assault, while 64% of the sexual assault reports were missing information on whether a prior assault had occurred. In a recently published meta-analysis, almost 50% of all child sexual abuse victims are sexually revictimised at some point in the future [64]. Such a high prevalence of revictimisation highlights the need to systematically ask any patient whether they are experiencing violence or whether they have experienced violence, in order to provide necessary support. It also highlights the need to inform both patients and health professionals that a previous assault increases the risk of experiencing another assault so that this can be eventually prevented or treated accordingly. Recently, researchers have found a relationship between hypersexuality or compulsive sexual behaviour and experienced trauma [65, 66]. Post-traumatic symptoms could lead to compulsive sexual behaviour through the pathway of depression, shame and guilt [66].
Medicolegal sexual assault consultations take place within the emergency department setting, usually within a short time frame making them a unique opportunity to provide patients with the necessary treatment for STIs, unwanted pregnancy and mental health symptoms. In our sample, 83% of the patients sought consultation for their sexual assault within 72 hours. Only 31% (n = 230) reported that they were using a contraceptive, which is extremely low in comparison to the two thirds of women using one or more contraceptive methods, as reported by the Federal Statistical Office [67]. Furthermore, only between 6% and 11% of our sample reported that a condom was used in the assault. The emergency contraceptive (ulipristal acetate 30 g or a copper intrauterine device) can be taken up to 5 days (120 hours) of unprotected sex. Such information should be widely available in information campaigns. 31% of the patients received the Post-Exposure Prophylaxis starter kit, until they had a follow-up meeting with the infectious diseases specialists (HUG) or the gynaecologist (CHUV). Missing information on the patient’s sexual assault report regarding treatments was a limitation of our retrospective review. Many reports did not include information on follow-up treatment and appointments. (Missing data: Infectious disease follow-up: 61%, Emergency contraception: 34%, Prophylactic antibiotics for gonorrhoea: 53%, Prophylactic antibiotics for chlamydia: 50%.) For comparative purposes, a US study looking at 939 sexual assault records and medications prescribed following emergency room visits found that 45.3% of the patients received emergency contraception while 97.3% did not receive antiviral post-exposure prophylactic medication. It also found that victims of sexual assault perpetrated by an intimate partner had a 48% decreased likelihood of being prescribed antibiotics and emergency contraception [68]. Studies as well as our clinical experience show that factors such as a patient’s concern for STIs, HIV and pregnancy are associated with treatment-seeking behaviour [69, 70]. Future prospective studies can add information on indications, prescriptions, acceptance and compliance with antibiotics, antiretrovirals and emergency contraception that we are currently unable to explore. Our protocols do not contain recommendations and information on the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). However, people who have been sexually assaulted are at risk of acquiring HPV infection and the efficacy of the HPV vaccine is high. Given the age of the population in this cohort, information and care could also address HPV, cervical screening and vaccination of HPV where relevant [71, 72].
Many studies found a significant decrease in the number of patients presenting for emergency care services during the COVID-19 pandemic, including women seeking emergency care for sexual assault [73–77]. The literature shows that reported sexual assault cases dropped to between 30% and 50% during the early days of the pandemic [76, 77]. Potential hypotheses include the reduction of some forms of sexual violence during this period, fear of exposure to COVID-19 in the emergency departments and lack of awareness of availability of services. While there may have been fewer absolute cases of sexual assault reported, the perpetrator was more likely to be the intimate partner, ex-intimate partner or family member compared with pre-COVID-19 reports [76, 77]. Many countries have reported an increase in domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular a higher incidence and severity of violence [78, 79]. While we do not have data on domestic violence reports during the pandemic, our results also show that fewer women reported sexual assault at the Geneva and Lausanne University Gynaecological ED in 2020 than in 2018, 2019 and 2021.
Medicolegal research has proven that documented injury can be an important factor in predicting the outcome of sexual assault prosecution and thus injury documentation is important in the forensic examination of sexual assault victims [80–82]. 45% of our patients bathed or washed themselves prior to coming to the emergency department. Although it is still possible to collect evidence, it is best not to bathe, shower, brush teeth or go to the bathroom before coming for a medicolegal exam. Ano-genital injuries were more frequent in patients who were examined within 24 hours of the assault [83]. In the literature, ano-genital injury prevalence has been reported in a wide range of 6% to 87% of victims seeking emergency care for sexual assault [83]. Our study found that 28% (n = 196) of the victims had some type of ano-genital injury. Research on injuries from consensual sexual intercourse also shows that genital lesions are also present in a wide range of patients, from 6% to 73%, and after excluding minors, from 6% to 55% [84].
Research has shown that the examining person’s experience and level of training in the detection of sexual assault injuries may influence the prevalence of genital injuries found [85, 86]. As the Geneva and Lausanne University Hospitals have residents at different stages of their training, there may be a variation of what junior and senior doctors detect as a genital injury. In Switzerland, the development of experts exclusively dedicated to documenting and caring for sexual assault victims has occurred in a few settings, such as the University of Zurich, which offers a Certificate of Advanced Studies (CAS) in Forensic Nursing. Another factor contributing to the sensitivity of ano-genital injury detection is whether gross visualisation, toluidine blue dye enhancement, colposcopy or anoscopy were used. Colposcopy is also used for documentation purposes, for interpretation and review by experts as well as for education purposes. Studies have shown that trained forensic doctors using colposcopy obtain evidence of ano-genital injury in 71% to 86% of rape victims [87, 88], which is higher than the 28% of ano-genital injuries found in our sample [88]. These same studies found that there was little difference in the detection of ano-genital injuries when gross visualisation and colposcopy were used, if the examiner is a highly trained sexual assault expert [80, 88]. In our study, we are unable to determine whether the colposcope was used systematically even though both CHUV and HUG protocols state that the colposcope should be systematically used. These findings may indicate the need to improve training in the ano-genital exam and use of colposcope by younger residents. Even though the gynaecological exam is conducted by the gynaecologists, the forensic residents are also present during the exam and experienced in detecting and recognising lesions. They can indeed contribute with the gynaecologist to the assessment and eventual interpretation of lesions.
Other prevalence studies of anal injuries following anal penetration vary with ranges from 16% to 22.3% [83, 89]. Our findings are reflected within this range, with anal injuries present in approximately 21% of the patients who reported anal penetration of any type (penile, digital or with an object). Anal injuries are progressively less frequently detected after 72 hours, which was also echoed in our study [51]. Anal penetration did not result in visible anal injury in the majority of cases. The external anal examination may be insufficient to visualise anal injury, and anoscopy may be required. Anal injury may also be minimised by the use of body fluids or other lubrication. No published studies have evaluated anal trauma resulting from consensual anal penetration [83]. More tears were identified on the anus following toluidine-blue as compared to direct visualisation, but not colposcopy [80].
We found similar results reconfirming what others have found – bodily injuries (non-genital) are more prevalent than ano-genital injuries in people who are sexually assaulted [83]. Body injuries were recorded in 84% of the sexual assault reports, with injuries to the upper and lower limbs being the most common sites. Forensic doctors recorded body injuries in 63% of the victims seeking emergency care for sexual assault in a study conducted at Geneva University Hospitals from 2005 to 2014 [47]. However, minor patients made up 26% of the sample, while our study included people aged 14 or older. The forensic doctors, even during residency, do not rotate and are trained and experienced in documenting and identifying body lesions. This is a part of their daily practice.
In our study, 7% of the survivors clearly stated that they did not intend to press charges while 17% declared that they intended to bring charges against their aggressor; for an overwhelming 75% of the sexual assaults, we do not have further information because the information was not included in the report or because the victim had not yet decided if they would bring charges against the perpetrator. In the US, large-scale research studies suggest that only 5–20% of sexual assaults are reported to the police. In the UK, latest estimates from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) showed that among people aged 16 to 59 years who were victims of sexual assault by rape or penetration above the age of 16, fewer than one in six (16%) female victims and fewer than one in five (19%) male victims reported it to the police [27]. To reiterate, there were 757 rapes reported in 2021 in the Swiss Police Crime Statistics, and 720 sexual assaults [25]. If we use the more conservative estimate that only 20% of sexual assaults are reported to the police, one could extrapolate a hypothetical estimate of the number of sexual assaults which would be much higher than 700 (3785 rapes and 3600 sexual assaults). There are a wide range of reasons that victims do not report sexual assault to the police such as being ashamed, not having faith in the criminal justice system, fear of retaliation, etc. Research also shows that many people who have been sexually assaulted do not necessarily recognise it as such and therefore do not report [90, 91]. This may also lead to revictimisation.
Most of the sample included people from Switzerland (39%) or other European countries (20%). Even though the cantons of Vaud and Geneva differ in terms of foreign population (34% for Vaud and 41% for Geneva), one might wonder if non-Swiss people consult less frequently after a sexual assault because of economic, insurance, language, access, cultural or information barriers [45, 92]. Future information and prevention campaigns could investigate and eventually target/include specifically non-Swiss populations.
We describe the use of a reproducible medicolegal protocol for caring for people who are sexually assaulted as well as the forms for reporting their characteristics at the obstetrics and gynaecology emergency departments in two Swiss cantons. HUG and CHUV are the two largest hospitals in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. We had a large data sample of 740 patients between 2018 and 2021. Because of the careful attention to definitions used for each variable, our study is easily reproducible either in another Swiss canton or in another country.
A large number of people will never report sexual assault to any type of official agency – whether hospital, police or other – and no extraction of administrative data will provide statistics about the extent of hidden sexual assault [24].
Incomplete data: Although both centres collect the same information, the requirements for which questions need a response varies between sites. Demographic data are missing from the reports, which highlights the importance of a nationally standardised database with a pre-defined minimum dataset, including, for example, nationality.
Amnesia: Approximately 25% of the patients in our study reported some kind of amnesia, either total or partial. This has a profound impact on the amount of available and exploitable data but is itself an important finding as discussed above. Amnesia could be a manifestation of the trauma of sexual assault (peritraumatic dissociation) or linked with substance use. Future studies need to take it into account in their design and data interpretation.
While we paid careful attention to the definitions of every variable used, there is no existing international classification or terminology to define and describe the injury types that should be used for each anatomical site. Furthermore, although we are unable to provide data on the sexual orientation or gender identity of the patients due to the retrospective nature of the study, we will aim to capture this information in future studies.
When the patients leave the emergency care facilities, they are given follow-up appointments. We are unable to provide data on the short-, medium- and longer-term care they received. Whether they attend the follow-up visits, whether they adhere to the treatment protocols, etc, remains part of the information gap that, we hope, will be covered by our ongoing prospective study.
There is a lack of data regarding sexual assault or rape in Switzerland. Reliable national and regional measurements of sexual assault and its health and social consequences can inform the design of effective social, economic, political and health responses. In addition, data are crucial to assess the effects of eventual prevention and support strategies and interventions, to prevent sexual assault and to dispel rape myths. We would like to further emphasise the need to collect data from various sources such as LAVI, police and other associations such as “Viol secours” in addition to the hospital data, because these different sources often receive different populations who have varying experiences and needs. Our hope is to create a national observatory of sexual assault reports in Swiss hospitals.
Approaches to gathering hospital data should be made uniform across Switzerland. We recommend a minimum dataset with a standardised set of variables to be collected across the country’s hospitals where sexual assaults can be reported. Common variable names, response options and definitions should be shared between all sites.
Creating a national observatory and minimum dataset requires the full support of the federation and collaboration between many different entities including emergency gynaecological and medicolegal departments. In examples of other mandatory registries, there is usually a legal mandate/law requiring the cantons or institutions to report certain data. For example, the Oncological Disease Registration Act (LEMO RS 818.33) requires doctors, laboratories, hospitals and other private or public institutions in Switzerland to declare cancer and tumour data to a national registry with the aim of creating a complete and fully exhaustive registry of oncological diseases in Switzerland. Similarly, the Swiss Neonatal Network & Follow-up Group (SwissNeoNet) created a Swiss Minimal Neonatal DataSet. All Swiss level III and level IIB institutions are required to provide hospital data for the registry thanks to the Inter-Cantonal Declaration for Highly Specialised Medicine (HSM) of 22 September 2011 [93].
Collection of a standardised sexual violence dataset at all locations where medicolegal exams are carried out in Switzerland could improve healthcare professionals’ standardisation in their documentation and coding. Classifications, such as the WHO’s International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD), provide a nationally and internationally comparable system for reporting and recording statistics on diseases and related health problems [94]. Standardised nomenclatures and classifications help public health authorities, professionals from different sectors (care, police, legal, associations and education) and the general public to record information about risk factors, sociodemographic characteristics, the experience of care and follow-up treatment of sexual assault. Recording data based on an aligned set of variables would allow the creation of a national dataset which could be used to analyse similarities and differences in types of sexual assaults, survivors and perpetrators, which healthcare services are being accessed and what resources are required for planning purposes and to improve access, care and healthcare experiences [95].
The deidentified data (including data dictionary) from this study, the analytical code used, the study protocol along with data from the prospective study will be shared in an open data repository once the prospective study results are available in late 2025 or early 2026.
(In alphabetical order:) Camille Béziane, Les Klamydias (external reviewer); Lucrezia Catania, gynaecologist-sexologist (external reviewer); Manuella Epiney, obstetrician and gynaecologist, HUG (external reviewer); Pia Genet, forensic doctor, CHUV (external reviewer); Muriel Golay, Center LAVI (external reviewer); Stéphanie Perez, lawyer, UNIGE (external reviewer); Prof.em.Dr.med. Elisabeth Zemp Stutz (external reviewer).
This project is funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Gender Equality (FOGE) and Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), as part of the wider project entitled “Sexual Assault Reporting – A study to improve prevention, information and care after sexual assault in emergency care settings”.
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflict of interest related to the content of this manuscript was disclosed.
1. World Health Organization. Violence against women. Intimate partner and sexual violence against women: Evidence Brief [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329889/WHO-RHR-19.16-eng.pdf?ua=1
2. RAINN. (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network). Sexual Assault [Internet]. RAINN.org. [cited 2023 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.rainn.org/articles/sexual-assault
3. U.N. Statistics Division. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: SDG Indicators, Metadata Repository: Target 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation [Internet]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/
4. European Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating violence against women and domestic violence [Internet]. Strasbourg; 2022 Mar. Report No.: 2022/0066 (COD). Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0105
5. www.coe.int (Council of Europe) [Internet]. Switzerland ratifies the Istanbul Convention. 2017. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/-/switzerland-ratifies-the-istanbul-convention
6. Bureau fédéral de l’égalité entre femmes et hommes, (BFEG). Plan d’action national de la Suisse en vue de la mise en œuvre la Convention d’Istanbul de 2022 à 2026 [Internet]. Bern: BFEG; 2022 Jun. Available from: https://www.ebg.admin.ch/ebg/fr/home/themes/droit/droit-international/conseil-de-l-europe/convention-d-istanbul.html
7. Fehlmann RL. Définition du viol en droit suisse. La loi doit changer! [Internet]. The Federal Assembly – The Swiss Parliament; 2017 Nov. (17.3992 Motion). Available from: https://www.parlament.ch/en/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=20173992
8. Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (GREVIO). GREVIO’s (Baseline) evaluation report (Switzerland) on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention) [Internet]. Strasbourg: Secretariat of the monitoring mechanism of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence; 2022 Nov. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/grevio-inf-2022-27-eng-final-draft-report-on-switzerland-publication/1680a8fc73
9. Fedlex. Swiss Penal Code [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/54/757_781_799/fr
10. République et canton de Genève. La Violence Domestique en Chiffres, Année 2023 [Internet]. Genève: Bureau de promotion de l’égalité et de prévention des violences (BPEV); 2024. Available from: https://www.ge.ch/document/36151/telecharger
11. World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women: executive summary [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2021. xii p. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341338
12. Killias M, Simonin M, De Puy J. Violence experienced by women in Switzerland over their lifespan. Results of the International Violence against Women Survey (IVAWS). Bern: Staempfli Publishers Ltd.; 2005.
13. Stern S, De Rocchi A. Données statistiques de la Suisse nécessaires à l’établissementdu rapport sur la mise en œuvre de la Convention d’Istanbul: Expertise. Zurich: Bureau fédéral de l’égalité entre femmes et hommes (BFEG); 2019 Feb.
14. gfs.bern. Le harcèlement sexuel et les violences sexuelles faites aux femmes sont répandus en Suisse [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 23]. Available from: https://cockpit.gfsbern.ch/fr/cockpit/violence-sexuelles-en-suisse/
15. Amnesty International. Switzerland: One in five women is a victim of sexual violence [Internet]. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/05/switzerland-one-in-five-women-is-a-victim-of-sexual-violence/
16. Murchison GR, Agénor M, Reisner SL, Watson RJ. School Restroom and Locker Room Restrictions and Sexual Assault Risk Among Transgender Youth. Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6):e20182902. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2902
17. (NSVRC) National Sexual Violence Resource Center. Sexual Violence & Transgender/Non-Binary Communities [Internet]. NSVRC.org. 2019. Available from: https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/publications/2019-02/Transgender_infographic_508_0.pdf
18. Marx BP, Heidt JM, Gold SD. Perceived Uncontrollability and Unpredictability, Self-Regulation, and Sexual Revictimization. Rev Gen Psychol. 2005 Mar;9(1):67–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.1.67
19. Hequembourg AL, Parks KA, Collins RL, Hughes TL. Sexual assault risks among gay and bisexual men. J Sex Res. 2015;52(3):282–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.856836
20. Canan SN, Jozkowski KN, Wiersma-Mosley JD, Bradley M, Blunt-Vinti H. Differences in Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Women’s Experiences of Sexual Assault and Rape in a National U.S. Sample. J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):9100–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519863725
21. Rothman EF, Exner D, Baughman AL. The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011 Apr;12(2):55–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010390707
22. Martin SL, Ray N, Sotres-Alvarez D, Kupper LL, Moracco KE, Dickens PA, et al. Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women. 2006 Sep;12(9):823–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206292672
23. Sigurvinsdottir R, Ullman SE. Sexual Orientation, Race, and Trauma as Predictors of Sexual Assault Recovery. J Fam Violence. 2016 Oct;31(7):913–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9793-8
24. European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). Administrative data collection on violence against women: Good practices [Internet]. Lithuania: EIGE; 2016 Nov. Available from:
25. Federal Statistical Office. Code pénal (CP) : Infractions pénales et personnes prévenues [Internet]. Crime and criminal justice. 2022. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/crime-criminal-justice/police/offences.assetdetail.21324220.html
26. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Rape and Sexual Assault Victimization Among College-age Females, 1995-2013. 2014 Dec. Report No.: NCJ 248471.
27. Office for National Statistics. Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW): Nature of sexual assault by rape or penetration, England and Wales: year ending March 2020. Crime Statistics; 2021 Mar.
28. Lieber M, Greset C, Perez-Rodrigo S. Le traitement pénal des violences sexuelles à Genève. Une étude exploratoire. 2019;
29. The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. Sexual offences [Internet]. Brottsförebyggande rådet; Available from: https://bra.se/bra-in-english/home/crime-and-statistics/sexual-offences.html
30. Federal Statistical Office. Consultations de victimes selon l’infraction [Internet]. Crime and criminal justice. 2022. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/criminalite-droit-penal/aide-victimes/consultations-prestations.assetdetail.22684359.html
31. Kendall T. A Synthesis of Evidence on the Collection and Use of Administrative Data on Violence against Women: Background Paper for the Development of Global Guidance. New York: UN Women; 2020.
32. Larsen ML, Hilden M, Lidegaard Ø. Sexual assault: a descriptive study of 2500 female victims over a 10-year period. BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):577–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13093
33. Kerr E, Cottee C, Chowdhury R, Jawad R, Welch J. The Haven: a pilot referral centre in London for cases of serious sexual assault. BJOG. 2003 Mar;110(3):267–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02233.x
34. Gisladottir A, Gudmundsdottir B, Gudmundsdottir R, Jonsdottir E, Gudjonsdottir GR, Kristjansson M, et al. Increased attendance rates and altered characteristics of sexual violence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Jan;91(1):134–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01283.x
35. Fryszer LA, Hoffmann-Walbeck H, Etzold S, Möckel M, Sehouli J, David M. Sexually assaulted women: results of a retrospective analysis of 850 women in Germany. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jul;250:117–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.059
36. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects – WMA – The World Medical Association. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
37. Confédération Suisse. SR 810.30 - Federal Act of 30 September 2011 on Research involving Human Beings (Human Research Act, HRA). Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2013/617/en
38. Confédération Suisse. SR 810.301 - Ordinance of 20 September 2013 on Human Research with the Exception of Clinical Trials (Human Research Ordinance, HRO). Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2013/642/en
39. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève. Protocole Complet de Prise en Charge au Departement de Gynecologie et d’Obstetrique des Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve des Personnes Victime D’Agression Sexuelle [Internet]. 2022 Jul [cited 2025 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.hug.ch/sites/interhug/files/structures/medecine_de_premier_recours/Strategies/cas-protocole.pdf
40. Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV). Agression sexuelle : prise en charge des femmes victimes- Protocole. Lausanne: CHUV; 2020 Jul.
41. Hamel C, Debauche A, Brown E, Lebugle A, Lejbowicz T, Mazuy M, et al. Viols et agressions sexuelles en France : premiers résultats de l’enquête Virage. Popul Soc (Paris). 2016;538(10):1–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/popsoc.538.0001
42. Lauritsen J, White N. Seasonal Patterns in Criminal Victimization Trends [Internet]. U.S. Department of Justice; 2014 Jun. Report No.: NCJ 245959. Available from: https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/spcvt.pdf
43. McLean I. Climatic effects on incidence of sexual assault. J Forensic Leg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):16–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.12.001
44. Burt MR. Cultural myths and supports for rape. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Feb;38(2):217–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
45. État de Vaud. Aide pour les victimes d’agression sexuelle ou de violence sexuelle [Internet]. vd.ch. Available from: https://www.vd.ch/themes/aides-financieres-et-soutien-social/soutien-aux-victimes-de-violence/aide-pour-les-victimes-dagression-sexuelle-ou-de-violence-sexuelle
46. République et canton de Genève. Viols et agressions sexuelles [Internet]. ge.ch. 2017 [cited 2023 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.ge.ch/viols-agressions-sexuelles
47. Ricard-Gauthier D, Abdulcadir J, Tony F, Yaron M. Care of women and girls after sexual assault in Geneva: a descriptive study between 2005 and 2014. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology [Internet]. 2021; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301211521004723
48. Testa M, Livingston JA. Alcohol consumption and women’s vulnerability to sexual victimization: can reducing women’s drinking prevent rape? Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(9-10):1349–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080902961468
49. Henry AP, Perillo AD, Reitz-Krueger CL, Perillo JT. Reflecting the Times? Reexamining the Effect of Alcohol Intoxication on Perceptions of Campus Sexual Assault. Violence Against Women. 2022 Jan;28(1):49–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211005559
50. Abbey A, Wegner R, Woerner J, Pegram SE, Pierce J. Review of survey and experimental research that examines the relationship between alcohol consumption and men’s sexual aggression perpetration. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014 Oct;15(4):265–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521031
51. Abbey A, Zawacki T, Buck PO, Clinton AM, McAuslan P. Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: what do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggress Violent Behav. 2004 May;9(3):271–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00011-9
52. Lippy C, DeGue S. Exploring Alcohol Policy Approaches to Prevent Sexual Violence Perpetration. Trauma Violence Abuse 17(1):26-42 [Internet]. 2014 Nov 16;17(1). Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/52842
53. Eshelman LR, Messman-Moore TL, Sheffer N. The Importance of Substance-Related Sexual Victimization: Impact on Substance Use and Risk Perception in Female College Students. J Interpers Violence. 2015 Sep;30(15):2616–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553630
54. Anderson LJ, Flynn A, Pilgrim JL. A global epidemiological perspective on the toxicology of drug-facilitated sexual assault: A systematic review. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Apr;47:46–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.02.005
55. Calasso K, Thompson-Memmer C, Kruse-Diehr AJ, Glassman T. Sexual Assault and Alcohol Use among College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature. AJHS [Internet]. 2020 Oct 21 [cited 2022 Dec 16];34(4). Available from: https://amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/45 doi: https://doi.org/10.47779/ajhs.2019.45
56. Basile KC, Smith SG, Liu Y, Lowe A, Gilmore AK, Khatiwada S, et al. Victim and perpetrator characteristics in alcohol/drug-involved sexual violence victimization in the U.S. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Sep;226:108839–108839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108839
57. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory [Internet]. Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/459#:~:text=Definition%3A,to%206%20standard%20alcoholic%20drinks
58. GREA - Groupement Romand d’Etudes des Addictions. Combien d’alcool contient un verre standard? [Internet]. Stop-alcool.ch. 2021. Available from: https://www.stop-alcool.ch/fr/l-alcool-en-general-2/une-substance-psychoactive/combien-y-a-t-il-d-alcool-dans-un-verre
59. Thompson-Hollands J, Jun JJ, Sloan DM. The Association Between Peritraumatic Dissociation and PTSD Symptoms: The Mediating Role of Negative Beliefs About the Self. J Trauma Stress. 2017 Apr;30(2):190–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22179
60. Miller AK. Peritraumatic Dissociation, Lack of Resolution, and Revictimization in Survivors of Sexual Trauma: An Avoidance Dilemma? [Internet]. Ohio University; 2002. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1081957240
61. Garcia-Esteve L, Torres-Gimenez A, Canto M, Roca-Lecumberri A, Roda E, Velasco ER, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for acute stress disorder in female victims of sexual assault. Psychiatry Res. 2021 Dec;306:114240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114240
62. Amstadter AB, Elwood LS, Begle AM, Gudmundsdottir B, Smith DW, Resnick HS, et al. Predictors of physical assault victimization: findings from the National Survey of Adolescents. Addict Behav. 2011 Aug;36(8):814–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.008
63. Trotman GE, Young-Anderson C, Deye KP. Acute Sexual Assault in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Dec;29(6):518–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.05.001
64. Walker HE, Freud JS, Ellis RA, Fraine SM, Wilson LC. The Prevalence of Sexual Revictimization: A Meta-Analytic Review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jan;20(1):67–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017692364
65. Kraus SW, Krueger RB, Briken P, First MB, Stein DJ, Kaplan MS, et al. Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11. World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):109–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20499
66. Fontanesi L, Marchetti D, Limoncin E, Rossi R, Nimbi FM, Mollaioli D, et al. Hypersexuality and Trauma: a mediation and moderation model from psychopathology to problematic sexual behavior. J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb;281:631–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.100
67. Federal Statistical Office. Swiss Health Survey 1992-2017: Contraception in Switzerland [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/news/whats-new.assetdetail.15844490.html
68. Gilmore AK, McKee G, Flanagan JC, Leone RM, Oesterle DW, Kirby CM, et al. Medications at the Emergency Department After Recent Rape. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP12954–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997434
69. Resnick HS, Holmes MM, Kilpatrick DG, Clum G, Acierno R, Best CL, et al. Predictors of post-rape medical care in a national sample of women. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Nov;19(4):214–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00226-9
70. Zinzow HM, Resnick HS, Barr SC, Danielson CK, Kilpatrick DG. Receipt of post-rape medical care in a national sample of female victims. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):183–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.025
71. Fontenot HB. Intersection of HPV and sexual assault: an opportunity for practice change [Internet]. J Forensic Nurs. 2013;9(3):146–54. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/forensicnursing/Fulltext/2013/07000/Intersection_of_HPV_and_Sexual_Assault__An.4.aspx doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0b013e318291b276
72. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines: Sexual Assault and Abuse and STIs – Adolescents and Adults [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/sexual-assault-adults.htm
73. Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A, DeVies J, Coletta MA, Boehmer TK, Adjemian J, et al.; National Syndromic Surveillance Program Community of Practice. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun;69(23):699–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1
74. Rennert-May E, Leal J, Thanh NX, Lang E, Dowling S, Manns B, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department visits: A population-based study. PLoS One. 2021 Jun;16(6):e0252441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252441
75. Santi L, Golinelli D, Tampieri A, Farina G, Greco M, Rosa S, et al. Non-COVID-19 patients in times of pandemic: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and cause-specific mortality in Northern Italy. PLoS One. 2021 Mar;16(3):e0248995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248995
76. Muldoon KA, Denize KM, Talarico R, Fell DB, Sobiesiak A, Heimerl M, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and violence: rising risks and decreasing urgent care-seeking for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors. BMC Med. 2021 Feb;19(1):20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01897-z
77. Kane D, Maher N, Eogan M. Assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Sexual Assault Treatment Unit activity. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;47(4):301–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201143
78. Gosangi B, Park H, Thomas R, Gujrathi R, Bay CP, Raja AS, et al. Exacerbation of Physical Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19 Pandemic. Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E38–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020202866
79. Barbara G, Albertini V Jnr, Tagi VM, Maggioni L, Gorio MC, Cattaneo C, et al. Characteristics of Sexual Violence Against Adolescent Girls: A 10 Years’ Retrospective Study of 731 Sexually Abused Adolescents. Int J Womens Health. 2022 Mar;14:311–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S343935
80. Zink T, Fargo JD, Baker RB, Buschur C, Fisher BS, Sommers MS. Comparison of methods for identifying ano-genital injury after consensual intercourse. J Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):113–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.08.024
81. McGregor MJ, Le G, Marion SA, Wiebe E. Examination for sexual assault: is the documentation of physical injury associated with the laying of charges? A retrospective cohort study. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 1999;160 11:1565–9.
82. McGregor MJ, Du Mont J, Myhr TL. Sexual assault forensic medical examination: is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jun;39(6):639–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.123694
83. Sugar NF, Fine DN, Eckert LO. Physical injury after sexual assault: findings of a large case series. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):71–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00912-8
84. Song SH, Fernandes JR. Comparison of Injury Patterns in Consensual and Nonconsensual Sex: Is It Possible to Determine if Consent was Given? Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Dec;7(4):619–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.23907/2017.052
85. Eckert LO, Sugar N, Fine D. Factors impacting injury documentation after sexual assault: role of examiner experience and gender. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1739–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.048
86. Makoroff KL, Brauley JL, Brandner AM, Myers PA, Shapiro RA. Genital examinations for alleged sexual abuse of prepubertal girls: findings by pediatric emergency medicine physicians compared with child abuse trained physicians. Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Dec;26(12):1235–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00419-2
87. Slaughter L, Brown CR. Colposcopy to establish physical findings in rape victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):83–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91834-W
88. Rogers A, McIntyre SL, Rossman L, Solis S, Bacon-Baguley TA, Jones J. The forensic rape examination: is colposcopy really necessary? Am J Emerg Med. 2019 May;37(5):999–1000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.015
89. Buswell H, Majeed-Ariss R, Rajai A, White C, Mills H. Identifying the prevalence of genito-anal injuries amongst clients attending St Mary’s Sexual Assault Referral Centre following an allegation of anal penetration. J Forensic Leg Med. 2022 Aug;90:102392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2022.102392
90. Wilson LC, Miller KE. Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Unacknowledged Rape. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Apr;17(2):149–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015576391
91. Littleton H, Layh M, Rudolph K. Unacknowledged Rape in the Community: Rape Characteristics and Adjustment. Violence Vict. 2018 Feb;33(1):142–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.1.142
92. Republique et Canton de Genève. Population du canton de Genève et le status migratoire. Office cantonal de la statistique (OCSTAT) Genève; 2017 Apr. Report No.: 55.
93.Fedlex, La plateforme de publication du droit fédéral. Décision concernant la planification de la médecine hautement spécialisée (MHS) dans le domaine des soins intensifs pour les nouveau-nés [Internet]. FF 2011 7456. 2011. Available from: https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/fga/2011/1385
94. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.) [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://icd.who.int/
95. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) and World Health Organization. (WHO). Global technical guidance: Improving the collection and use of administrative data on violence against women. New York: UN Women; 2022.
The appendix is available in the pdf version of the article at https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3913.