Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Vol. 145 No. 0506 (2015)

Statistical analysis and reporting: common errors found during peer review and how to avoid them

  • Gillian Worthy
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14076
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14076
Published
25.01.2015

Summary

When performing statistical peer review for Swiss Medical Weekly papers there often appear to be common errors or recurring themes regarding the reporting of study designs, statistical analysis methods, results and their interpretation. In order to help authors with choosing and describing the most appropriate analysis methods and reporting their results, we have created a guide to the most common issues and how to avoid them. This guide will follow the recommended structure for original papers as provided in the guidelines for authors (http://blog.smw.ch/what-smw-has-to-offer/guidelines-for-authors/), and provide advice for each section. This paper is intended to provide an overview of statistical methods and tips for writing your paper; it is not a comprehensive review of all statistical methods. Guidance is provided about the choice of statistical methods for different situations and types of data, how to report the methods, present figures and tables, and how to correctly present and interpret the results.

Summary

Ensure the results reported in the summary are consistent with those in the main text.

Do not report additional results which have not appeared in the main text.

References

  1. Machin D, Campbell MJ. Design of studies for medical research. Chichester: Wiley; 2005.
  2. Noordzij M, et al. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1388–93.
  3. Altman D, Gore SM, Gardner MJ, Pocock SJ. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. BMJ. 1983;286:1489–93.
  4. Lang T. Twenty statistical errors even YOU can find in biomedical research articles. Croat Med J. 2004;45(4):361–70.
  5. Lang T, Altman D. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in clinical medical journals: the SAMPL Guidelines. In: Smart P, Maisonneuve H, Polderman A (eds). Science Editors’ Handbook, European Association of Science Editors, 2013.
  6. Campbell MJ, Machin D. Medical statistics a commonsense approach. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2003.
  7. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential medical statistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.
  8. Young J. When should you use statistics? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135:337–8.
  9. Young J. Statistical errors in medical research – a chronic disease? Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:41–3.
  10. Strasak AM, et al. Statistical errors in medical research – a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:44–9.
  11. Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
  12. Katz MH. Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of medical research. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:644–50.